我認為答案是E, 原因是選項C改變了原句的結構 選項C在灰色色塊的部份,miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear
應該要是"miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them"才對,
GWD-12-Q19: Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear. A. Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear. B. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear. C. An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past. D. Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear. E. Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
以下轉自國外論壇: http://www.urch.com/forums/gmat-sentence-correction/91865-commitment.html ----------------------------------------- The answer is E.
A is wrong because "heavy commitment ... makes it likely to miss ... or misinterpret ..." doesn't make sense. Makes what likely to miss or misinterpret? Heavy commitment? Should be something more like "makes it likely that the executive will miss..."
B is wrong because it says illogically that the executive makes missing or misinterpreting signs likely.
C is wrong because "miss or misinterpret signs... when they do appear" does not make sense -- either they miss the signs or they misinterpret the signs when they do appear. Has to be: "miss signs... or misinterpret them when they do appear." Another problem with C is the ambiguous pronoun reference in: "if it has worked well in the past." "It" is meant to refer to "course of action," but in C could just as easily be felt to refer to "incipient trouble."
D has several problems. "Executives' being heavily committed" is an awkward subject. The pronoun in "makes them likely" is referring to a noun that is in the possessive case. The gerund "misinterpreting" does not parallel the infinitive "to miss."
There’s nothing wrong with E. "Being heavily committed to a course of action" is not a modifying phrase; it's a noun phrase functioning as the subject: "Being ... committed ... is likely to ..." |