Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
Heavy commitment by an executive to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes it likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that worked well in the past, makes missing signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting ones likely when they do appear.
An executive who is heavily committed to a course of action is likely to miss or misinterpret signs of incipient trouble when they do appear, especially if it has worked well in the past.
Executives’ being heavily committed to a course of action, especially if it has worked well in the past, makes them likely to miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpreting them when they do appear.
Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past, is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
我还是觉得C对。
关于C中it的指代问题:
it之前有三个名词:executive,a course of action 和signals,这三个中只有a course of action 能用it指代,所以即使it离的再远,它也是只能指代a course of action.这是一种强制指代吧。
E中Being heavily committed to a course of action,接下来主语应该是executive才对,而在E中Being heavily committed to a course of action却变成了句子的主语,结构变成了Being done something is ......这在GMAT中好像是不提倡的。
Being heavily committed to a course of action, especially one that has worked well in the past , is likely to make an executive miss signs of incipient trouble or misinterpret them when they do appear.
What do you think, don't you think the original looks most like E?
而E,being ... is likely to make sb. do sth.若把is likely to去掉,看直接意思更有问题:being ... make sb.do sth.因此,问题到不是being ...是谁发出的动作(表被动时,有不确定动作发出者的情况)而是make sb. do sth.能不能由being ...来实现。