这个。。这次选的这篇果然够越障。。得瑟+小心肝乱颤。。 得分两次读,一会儿要模考了。。 20min Studying whether the two factor, the knowledge(?) of auditors and the auditing fees comparing to client company's revenue, influent the investor's assessment of the company. Results: the former factor does affect the assessment while the latter does not. 1. Current opinions about these two factors: basically most people agree that the knowledge of auditors does affect the perceptions of investors toward the companies audited. But they part company when it comes to the second factor. 2. WS contends that the auditing fees does change the opinions of company's prospective investor. Some other researchers believe the same and have conducted researchers to buttress the theory (while WS didn't come up with any data and only theoretically analyze the situations). 3. Some others seems to disagree, including the author of the article. 1. H1: blah blah, mainly claiming that the fees of auditing negatively affect investors assessment of the company. The reason for this is that the increase in auditing fees is likely an indicator that there are serious problems in the company so that it takes more energy for auditors to handle with the auditing work with the company. Some people disagree. They think the auditors' efforts are not dependent on the fees they charge. 2. H2: fees positively affect the assessment. -- by 会员 抓抓sandra (2011/8/18 8:03:45)
继续读完。 18:48,嗝屁了。。
前面有些读错了的地方.. Brief Correction: What actually affect the investing risks assessment is the economically dependence of the auditing company on its revenue; what does not influence the assessment is the auditing fees.
后半篇还是看的云雾缭绕的,一直走神。逼着读完的。能写多少写多少了……
1. Control experiment is conducted. 2. Several statistical indicators reveal that the EA's manipulation is significant while the AF's is not. Thus the EA does have its effect on the assessment of investment. However, EA does not influence other two kinds of decisions(?). AF affect NONE of the three decisions.
- SUMMARY and CONCLUDING REMARKS
1. Repeat the main conclusion of how do EA and AF each affect the assessment of investment. 2. APPLICATION: (1) For companies, they should avoid hiring auditing companies that are economically dependent on its clients; (2) For auditing companies, they should avoid taking assignments from clients who tend to influence them(?); (3) For risk investors, they need to focus on the EA of the companies they are considering to put money in. 3. DRAWBACKS: (1) The experiment is conducted without actual investment actions and thus might lack practical facts to lend support; (2) The statistical results of EA and AF might be interpreted in another way; (3) 完全不记得了……
终于虐完了~ |