SDCAR2010【逻辑入门】（四）Role (Boldface)

巫汤汤

sdcar2010 发表于 2014-4-30 03:23
Inference is a conclusion YOU draw from the paragraph, NOT a conclusion stated in the paragraph by ...

醍醐灌顶!I cann't find a proper expression in English, thank you very much!

carnelian_li

又看完一贴···

yuxiaohe

mark·~~~真是好帖

skylar3

受益匪浅，谢谢LZ~膜拜啊，马上要考试了，啊呀，早点看到此帖就好啦~
还有一个问题求LZ解答，谢谢啦
帖子第五题：Aroca City
当中A，
”Well, pay attention to this sentence after the 1st BF: "The critics are correct on this point." So no objection/reservation/concerns from the author toward 1st BF. ”
A 出现了objection，但原文的意思是同意critics的观点对吗？所以要不能有反对的观点。所以B的1st就是对的，B说的是原文支持的critisism。
还有一个问题哦，critisism到底是不是贬义啊，出现critic一定会有反对观点出现吗~
真的太感谢了~第一次发帖问大神问题，好紧张的说，也不知道有没有表达清楚嘞~

还想再补充一问，
第四题 Enovironmental org.
A.项是evidence的错误吗，但是把他理解成evidence中的example可不可以~谢谢~

isecant

前8道只对了第8个。。先码住以后再研究后面的题

echogmj

thanks for sharing ~

605180212

大神，还在吗？In traditional small towns, people used to work and shop in the same town in which they lived; but now that stores and workplaces are located far away from residential areas, people cannot avoid traveling long distances each day (Evidence). 我觉得这里更像background呢，因为你说evidence是支持main conclusion的，但是main conclusion是Something must be done to ease traffic congestion。我觉得没有支持到啊，人们不能避免每天都要出行很长举例不能支持到我们要做些事情来改善交通拥挤，因为evidence并没有提及交通拥挤。我觉得evidence应该是类似于说交通拥挤坏处的句子。感谢楼主回复呢

sdcar2010

605180212 发表于 2015-12-9 21:50
大神，还在吗？In traditional small towns, people used to work and shop in the same town in which the ...

You do have a point.

Ignore this question. It is too confusing and it may not be a real GMAT-type bold face question.

605180212

sdcar2010 发表于 2015-12-10 01:50
You do have a point.

Ignore this question. It is too confusing and it may not be a real GMAT-type ...

哦哦，谢谢大神的回复，那如果大神有空的时候希望可以带大家做一些og或者prep上面的题目，然后亮出你的分析过程，感觉对大家很有帮助呢。我就是看了你的帖子之后对逻辑和英语都超感兴趣。之前蛮害怕逻辑和全英文的，因为我是典型的没有逻辑的文科生，而且我从小都很畏惧看全英文的东西。但是看了你的帖子之后发现我现在超爱看全英文的关于gmat的东西。非常谢谢你呢

爱哭的santa

题目都好混淆