gwd-1-35,37

rei

第一段：

  在采购过程中，针对两种供货商和产品的情况和关系，分别采用相应策略：
1、typically---directly related to end products (运用competitve scrutiny采购)；
2、not directly related to production (favor “supplier partnerships”---避开competitve scrutiny采购)。 通过两变量的变化组合，可总结归纳出四种具体情况。

第二段：

  Type 1，2，3 situations --- by bidding or threat (infer: direct，采购策略-运用并受competitve scrutiny约束)。
  Type 4 situations, … partnerships may be unavoidable. (infer: indirect 情况，采购策略-避开competitve scrutiny)。

呼应平行第一段，漂亮的结构。

litperi

以下是引用tianwan在2004-6-23 8:34:00的发言：

Q35, B is wrong because of "an explanation for the occurrence of a
                    situation "

Q37, I agree with you.

35选B

如果按照“correctness的错误要严重于effectiveness的错误”的话

B不过是犯了effectiveness的错误 或者说根本没有犯错误

因为一次只能发生一种situation

但是C里面谈到strategy

第二段里面只涉及到situation的解释根列举

没有谈到strategy的问题

所谓strategy是一种策略 文章讨论的就不是一个策略的问题

“There are two

independent variables—availability

of alternatives and ease of changing

suppliers—that companies should

 (20)      use to evaluate”

而且第二段紧跟“This can create four possible   

situations”出现

所以明显是situation的列举

而且indirect跟direct purchase只能说是purchase pattern跟purchase strategy绝对是两码事！

综上所述 35选B

situations”出现

所以明显是situation的列举

而且indirect跟direct purchase只能说是purchase pattern跟purchase strategy绝对是两码事！

综上所述 35选B

luluQ

GWD1-37

We can find answer fr the text:

competitive scrutiny is typically limited to suppliers of items that are directly related to end products.

With “indirect” purchases (such as computers, advertising, and legal services), which are not directly related to production,

All mentions relationship to production or end products.

So my answer: D

晴天小狗

Q35:

Which of the following best describes the relation of the second paragraph to the first?

          

1. The second paragraph offers proof of an assertion made in the first paragraph.

2. The second paragraph provides an explanation for the occurrence of a situation described in the first paragraph.

3. The second paragraph discusses the application of a strategy proposed in the first paragraph.

4. The second paragraph examines the scope of a problem presented in the first paragraph.

5. The second paragraph discusses the contradictions inherent in a relationship described in the first paragraph.

I hold for B.  文章说了一种是direct，一种是indirect- supplier partinership（重点分析这个），之后写了2个影响因素。第二段就分析影响因素，何时产生sp.  原文并没有application of a strategy
        

请指正

另外，这个怎么翻...which
can inappropriately shelter suppliers
from rigorous competitive scrutiny
that might afford the purchaser
economic leverage

Bill06

以下是引用晴天小狗在2006-10-24 22:26:00的发言：

Q35:

Which of the following best describes the relation of the second paragraph to the first?

          

1. The second paragraph offers proof of an assertion made in the first paragraph.

2. The second paragraph provides an explanation for the occurrence of a situation described in the first paragraph.

3. The second paragraph discusses the application of a strategy proposed in the first paragraph.

4. The second paragraph examines the scope of a problem presented in the first paragraph.

5. The second paragraph discusses the contradictions inherent in a relationship described in the first paragraph.

I hold for B.  文章说了一种是direct，一种是indirect- supplier partinership（重点分析这个），之后写了2个影响因素。第二段就分析影响因素，何时产生sp.  原文并没有application of a strategy
  

请指正

另外，这个怎么翻...which
can inappropriately shelter suppliers
from rigorous competitive scrutiny
that might afford the purchaser
economic leverage

（合作伙伴供应商策略）会不恰当地袒护供应商免受激烈竞争性审查，而这种审查可以给购买者提供一定的经济调节优惠（杠杆调节，言下之意，如果有审查在价格上会对购买者有好处，也正是36题选B的原因）

williamjin

Q35我坚持B,yinwei:

1）strategy为为取得一个结果而计划的一串动作。Situation为同时发生的事件2）第1段说scrutiny及partnership两件事，没说目的。

Drakedirect

35 C
37 D
Totally agree

tangzimo

以下是引用cdg2004在2005-6-7 11:46:00的发言：

对于间接采购，公司经常采用战略伙伴关系(即在这种关系中，采购人员不需要寻找可替换的供应商)，这样就不恰当地使供应商逃避了的严格的竞争筛选，而这种筛选是能够为采购人员提供价格谈判优势的。

无比感谢啊！主要就是这句不懂。

不过，我觉得是不是这样说更好？

对于间接采购，公司经常采用战略伙伴关系(即在这种关系中，采购人员不可以寻找可替换的供应商)，这样就不恰当地使供应商逃避了的严格的竞争筛选，而这种筛选是能够为采购人员提供价格谈判优势的。

：）

各位以为如何？

tangzimo

以下是引用xxiaoyan在2005-8-25 16:20:00的发言：
似乎这篇文章的答案都在第一段，赫赫

就是……

只可惜，我一点儿都看不懂。明知道好像第二段基本和问题无关，但就是找不到相应的信息……

tangzimo

我认为35应该就是C嘛

There are two

independent variables—availability

of alternatives and ease of changing

suppliers—that companies should

 (20)     use to evaluate the feasibility of

       subjecting suppliers of indirect

       purchases to competitive scrutiny.

我觉得，都说了use 什么东西去evaluate了，这就是一个strategy