gwd-7-38

fair_sword

Journalist:  Well-known businessman Arnold Bergeron has long been popular in the state, and he has often talked about running for governor, but he has never run.  However, we have just learned that Bergeron has fulfilled the financial disclosure requirement for candidacy by submitting a detailed list of his current financial holdings to the election commission.  So, it is very likely that Bergeron will be a candidate for governor this year.

E,无法解决划线中的2个问题。如果选举根本不要提交这个东东。那么过去是否B提交过没有什么关系。

但是B，就不一样，回答yes, 很有可能B要选举.very likely(文章的可能性正是表明了非充分性）..  回答no，可能性不大。如果原文没有very likely，B就错。

fair_sword

又想了一下。如果选E, 那么对E分别正，反回答的结果就很让人费解，

原文说，but he has never run.  

E,正向回答yes. 他以前登记了，but he has never run. 。 推出登记和选举没有什么关系。因为他never

反yes,没有登记。没有选举>>>登记了，可能选举，好像不是逆否命题.吧(非A>>非B, A>>B, 如果是B>>>A,就对了)。不好意思，刚起来，还不是很清楚

请NN指点！

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-7-15 7:59:41编辑过]

fair_sword

up

mindfree

Since you mentioned required condition and sufficient condition, we start there. Filing is apparently a sufficient condition based on the question. Answer to B will help find out whether it is also a required condition. However, whether it is required is not relevant. Just make up an example:

Tom bought flight ticket from Baffalo to NYC. We think he is going to NYC. However, buying flight ticket is not a required condition. He can buy train ticket or just get a rental car. It is a sufficient condition but adequate to evaluate whether he is going. Whether it is required does not lend any help to this evaluation.

fair_sword

以下是引用mindfree在2004-7-16 3:00:00的发言：

Since you mentioned required condition and sufficient condition, we start there. Filing is apparently a sufficient condition based on the question. Answer to B will help find out whether it is also a required condition. However, whether it is required is not relevant. Just make up an example:

Tom bought flight ticket from Baffalo to NYC. We think he is going to NYC. However, buying flight ticket is not a required condition. He can buy train ticket or just get a rental car. It is a sufficient condition but adequate to evaluate whether he is going. Whether it is required does not lend any help to this evaluation.

非常谢谢mindfree,  E对

如果B是Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election ，那我觉得就对了，

同样，上面的例子，如果 flight ticket  is the only way, 也对。

是吗？mindfree,

jackylin76

以下是引用fair_sword在2004-7-16 9:06:00的发言：

如果B是Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election ，那我觉得就对了，

fair_sword,再看看B选项,Is submitting a list of holdings the only way to fulfill the election commission’s financial disclosure requirements?

我觉得你14日的分析是对的.

对B的肯定回答加强结论,因为是only way

对B的否定回答削弱结论中的very likely,

fair_sword

谢谢楼上，可是我反驳不了mindfree. 其实这个题是B, E里面那个好的问题。

zcy8888

同意E．　"very likely"　应是现状与曾经相比．＂useful in evaluating ＂则应在现状与曾经之间找出差别．

dream1111

以下是引用mindfree在2004-7-13 23:31:00的发言：

I think B will be correct if the question says that he did not submit the list.

I prefer E in this case.

Agree,

Here, obviously requiring to compare the relationship between this person's submitting a list and running a selection. There is nothing with how many ways fulfilling requirements itself has.   

Some of keys of CR questions of GWD in CD look mindless and misleading , right?  

Some of SC are uncertain though, they are not mindless.

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-9-7 15:01:04编辑过]

youpiao

我好象在哪作过一道极似的题，应该是在GEMJ的大全里作过，答案也是E的思路。找了半天没找着。 反正我选E。