2nd AD@Columbia MAFN VS Oxford MFE，纠结求选校

zbb88

只要你想找肯找，问题不大。很多人第一轮没找到，利用PSW的期限毕业后找到。如果你之前没有TOP金融机构的实习经历，那直接定位到大型实体企业的FINANCE TRAINEE PROGRAM也不错，我认识一些人走的这条路。

无法阻挡的兔子

说实话 oxford is a better choice in your case.
你的数理背景不是很强，去读Columbia的MAFN会很吃力，而Columbia的MAFN的对口的职位是risk、IT或者比较quant的职位，你确定这是你想做的么？
如果是的话就去C不是的话Ox更适合你

PerduAnge

只要你想找肯找，问题不大。很多人第一轮没找到，利用PSW的期限毕业后找到。如果你之前没有TOP金融机构的实习经历，那直接定位到大型实体企业的FINANCE TRAINEE PROGRAM也不错，我认识一些人走的这条路。

-- by 会员 zbb88 (2011/3/18 23:42:46)

如果有英资基金公司的实习，会不会很有帮助呢？

zbb88

那当然啦。哪家？

PerduAnge

那当然啦。哪家？

-- by 会员 zbb88 (2011/3/18 23:47:09)

prudential。。。

PerduAnge

说实话 oxford is a better choice in your case.
你的数理背景不是很强，去读Columbia的MAFN会很吃力，而Columbia的MAFN的对口的职位是risk、IT或者比较quant的职位，你确定这是你想做的么？
如果是的话就去C不是的话Ox更适合你

-- by 会员 无法阻挡的兔子 (2011/3/18 23:43:16)

quant。。。感觉会不会是分析师比较适合自己。。。但是现在不是感觉欧洲的学位给人一种很水的感觉么。。。

蒙太奇

晕倒。。其实所有学校的MFE,MFM类型出来找工作都差不多。。。什么叫跟RISK比较对口。。。如果LZ你没有W/E去任何地方都非常非常难拿到FO的OFFER。我敢说PRINCETON也不行。

说白了，这跟找工作没关系。这年头进FO？？玩笑开大了。。

蒙太奇

If you want to do quant stuff, Columbia is better. If you prefer general finance (Banking, Equity Research), Oxford is better. C has better reputation in HK but O is definitely a brighter brand in mainland.

-- by 会员 youayou (2011/3/18 21:06:09)

I don't think it's "definitely"...C looks better than O in mainland china.....that is for sure...

But in the states, O could be better than C as fewer ppl come from O and americans always want to trace their roots...lol

PerduAnge

If you want to do quant stuff, Columbia is better. If you prefer general finance (Banking, Equity Research), Oxford is better. C has better reputation in HK but O is definitely a brighter brand in mainland.

-- by 会员 youayou (2011/3/18 21:06:09)

I don't think it's "definitely"...C looks better than O in mainland china.....that is for sure...

But in the states, O could be better than C as fewer ppl come from O and americans always want to trace their roots...lol

-- by 会员 蒙太奇 (2011/3/19 0:22:20)

so,it is opposite to the common sense？