明天考，还有两个题目，请各位NN帮我确认一下

mariezhu

les MM 这一题选The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does
好像已经确定了的啊

LES

marie mm，偶又看了一遍题目，还是觉得选A。看了看你们以前讨论的，好像偶们对题目的理解有偏差。先看看偶的理解：

In one state , all cities and most towns have antismoking ordinance . A petition entitled " petition for statewide smoking restriction" is being circulated to voters by campain workers who ask only . " Do you want to sign a petition for statewide smoking restriction ?" the petition advocates a state law banning smoking in most retail establishments and in government offices that are open to the public .

Which of the following circumstances would make the petitionj as circulated misleading to voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide ?
问：下面那种情况会误导投票者认为这个请愿书只是把地方法规扩展到全国范围？言下有两层意思：

1. 这个法规实际上并不是单单将地方现有的法规扩展适用到全国范围，而是在条款上有区别的。
2. 即是有误导作用的，那么就是说它们对投票者来说就是简单的将法规扩展到全国范围，而没有指出其中的区别。

(A) The state law would not affect existing local ordinances baning smoking in places where the fire authorities have determined that smoking would constitute a fire hazard   
((D) The state law would supersede the local antismoking ordinances, which contain stronger bans than the state law does

A，消除了差异，更确切地说使差异没有体现出来，就会产生误导。
D，恰恰指出了差异，就不会产生误导。

你先看看偶的对题目的理解是否正确？谢谢！

[此贴子已经被作者于2004-5-21 15:58:14编辑过]

mariezhu

我明白我们俩答案的差异了,我的理解是这样的,和MM刚好相反:

Which of the following circumstances would make the petition as circulated misleading to <voters who understand the proposal as extending the local ordinances statewide >?

下列哪种情形会使这项请愿对投票人产生误导?这些投票人将这一建议理解为地区级条令向国家级条令的延伸

我觉得整个who从句是用来修饰voters的定语,你说呢?

LES

Sounds right.

偶现在有点糊涂了。问mm，这题法规正确的理解是什么，误导后的理解又是什么呢？请mm给出理由。谢谢！

LES

marie mm，偶又研读了一遍题目，对于who修饰voters没有疑义。但偶觉得问题的关键是：voters对条款的理解(who引导的从句的内容)是不是误导的结果？偶认为是。

大家都来参与讨论啊！谢谢！

mariezhu

结合题目和所问的问题,我是这样想的:

各个城市原来就有禁烟令,现在的请愿书是想在全州范围内实现禁烟,禁止在对公众开放的销售场所和政府机关内吸烟. 人们都已为这是对原有的本城市禁烟令的一种延伸,可是如果新的全州范围内的法令把原来的禁烟令中更严格的规定取消了, 那么这就不是所谓的人们理解的延伸措施了,因此misleading

不对的地方MM请指正

mariezhu

which one makes the petition misleading to voters?

1.Voters understand the petition as extending the local ordinances statewide

2.the petition misleads the voters (the petition is misleading to voters)

3.which one makes the petition mislead them?

LES

marie mm，还是不太明白你的意思

问题是问怎么样的情况会产生误导。D清楚地说明了state law与local law的差异，怎么会对voters 产生误导呢？

偶觉得误导是这样产生的，事实：异因同果，误导的过程和结果：根据这个同果推出自己认定的那个原因，而这个原因可能并不是真正的原因。

babypace

斑竹马到成功！考的如何，上来说说感想啊？

dashasha

顶一下，关于这里的“禁烟”这道题目，不明白。到底应该选什么？哪位NN帮忙解释一下？