这道罗技谁能帮忙分析分析

jojobqq

Industrial accidents are more common when some of the people in safety-sensitive jobs have drinking problems than when none do.Since, even after treatment, people who have had drinking problems are somewhat more likely than other people to have drinking problems in the future, any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treated for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.



Which of the following, if true, most seriously undermines the argument above?
A.Some companies place employees who are being treated for drinking problems in residential programs and allow them several weeks of paid sick leave.

B.Many accidents in the workplace are the result of errors by employees who do not hold safety-sensitive jobs.

C.Workers who would permanently lose their jobs if they sought treatment for a drinking problem try instead to conceal their problem and continue working for as long as possible.

D.People who hold safety-sensitive jobs are subject to stresses that can exacerbate any personal problems they may have, including drinking problems.

E.Some industrial accidents are caused by equipment failure rather than by employee error.

谢谢各位同学啦

david0106

答案是d吗？

zhangjy

B?

sdcar2010

C is the answer.

self

B(个人猜测)
本题说：工人喝酒对于事故的影响
答案B说：事故不是由那些喝酒的人引起的，也就削弱了 工人喝酒对事故的影响。
不知回答满意否

sdcar2010

In GMAT terms, many = some = between 1 out of 100 and 100 out of 100.

sdcar2010

Premise: workers with previous drinking problem is more prone to accidents than worker with no previous drinking problems.

Conclusion: any employer trying to reduce the risk of accidents should bar anyone who has ever been treated for a drinking problem from holding a safety-sensitive job.

That is a pretty drastic measure.  Let's see if any of the answer choice would ruin this otherwise foolproof safety measure. (C) says that workers might lie about their drinking problem and can still remain on the job. Then based on the premise, these liars would be accident prone! So drastic measure, once installed, might not lead to reduction of accidents.  

(C) weakens the arugment.

yayafl

OG自测中的，答案是C：题干中的解决办法是说，雇人的就不能找有接受治疗前科的。C：说的是很多有问题的为了避免被解雇，会隐藏自己的问题。

解决办法是建立在工人的诚信的。C说工人没有诚信。失去了前提。

新人之个人意见而已

gerriegu

应该是D吧  因果倒置
不是因为酗酒而make accident 是因为safety-related job导致压力所以才酗酒

sdcar2010

应该是D吧  因果倒置
不是因为酗酒而make accident 是因为safety-related job导致压力所以才酗酒

-- by 会员 gerriegu (2010/12/23 12:00:19)

D is not 因果倒置 because it links stress, NOT accidents, as a cause for drinking problems. Thus D has no effect on the argument.