ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 2298|回复: 3
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教:大全-B-2

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-5-13 10:28:00 | 只看该作者

请教:大全-B-2

In the years since the city of London imposed strict air-pollution regulations on local industry, the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically. Similar air-pollution rules should be imposed in other major cities.


Each of the following is an assumption made in the argument above EXCEPT:


(A) In most major cities, air-pollution problems are caused almost entirely by local industry.


(B) Air-pollution regulations on industry have a significant impact on the quality of the air.


(C) The air-pollution problems of other major cities are basically similar to those once suffered by London.


(D) An increase in the number of bird species in and around a city is desirable.


               (E) The increased sightings of bird species in and around London       reflect an actual increase in the number of species in the area.


答案是A 吗? 我怎麽觉得E对呢?  请大家帮忙看看.


沙发
发表于 2004-5-13 10:48:00 | 只看该作者

感觉a中的entirely有问题

the number of bird species seen in and around London has increased dramatically

这里的dramatically可以是由原来的每天看到1只变成了每天看到20只,这个变化可谓很大,但是可能工业并不是主要的污染源,也有可能是农业,比如农药啊,如果把农药的污染减少的话,还有可能每天看到200只小鸟呢

e这个假设在原文的推理过程中是必要的

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2004-5-13 11:13:00 | 只看该作者

多谢番茄炒蛋的解释,不好意思我写错了,我选的是D,我是不明白为什麽D不对呢?

地板
发表于 2004-5-21 18:23:00 | 只看该作者

harvardstudent mm

这道题你研究出来了吗 ?

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&ID=51713

一起讨论吧

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 14:53
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部