- UID
- 692707
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2011-11-15
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
prep 08, p72, 220题 个人认为语法笔记上关于时态的解释不好。我把在这个讨论贴里的发过来: http://forum.chasedream.com/GMAT_SC/thread-645735-1-1.html
“B. after it had fallen时态上没有问题,可以与over the last two years搭配,但是不如after falling简洁” _from语法笔记
这个解释不准确。把B选项代入原句 The results of the company's cost-cutting measures are evident in its profits, B. which had increased five percent during the first three months of this year after it had fallen 那么整个句子的时态就是:一般现在时,过去完成时,过去完成时 发现问题了么?就是时态间存在gap——跳跃了过去时。Manhattan那本书里面说过在一个句子里面时态不能有"gap" (p111),比如不能: The scientist BELIEVED that the machine WILL BE wonderful. 所以B选项时态就是错的。改成which increased ... after it had fallen就对,也表明了时间顺序的逻辑关系,也可以是which have increased ... after it fell。这两者之间我更倾向于后者(前者也不能说错吧),原因是从逻辑上理解, The results ... are evident in its profits, which 主句are一般现在时,用现在完成时能够很好的表达“过去的事情对现在产生影响”这个逻辑含义,所以更preferred。
|
|