ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (CBPX)

00:00:00

Spending on research and development by United States businesses for 1984 showed an increase of about8 percent over the 1983 level. This increase actually continued a downward trend evident since 1981 – whenoutlays for research and development increased 16.4 percent over 1980 spending. Clearly, the 25 percent taxcredit enacted by Congress in 1981, which was intended to promote spending on research and development,did little or nothing to stimulate such spending.

The conclusion of the argument above cannot be true unless which of the following is true?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3085|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG104 CR

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2010-5-17 13:40:37 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
1.1.1.c 取非型特例: 非此因型


OG104. Spending on research and development by United States businesses for 1984 showed an increase of about 8 percent over the 1983 level. This increase actually continued a downward trend evident since 1981 – when outlays for research and development increased 16.4 percent over 1980 spending. Clearly, the 25 percent tax credit enacted by Congress in 1981, which was intended to promote spending on research and development, did little or nothing to stimulate such spending.



The conclusion of the argument above cannot be true unless which of the following is true?

(A) Business spending on research and development is usually directly proportional to business profits.

(B) Business spending for research and development in 1985 could not increase by more than 8.3%.

(C) Had the 1981 tax credit been set higher than 25%, business spending for research and development after 1981 would have increased more than it did.

(D) In the absence of the 25% tax credit, business spending for research and development after 1981 would not have been substantially lower than it was.D

(E) Tax credits market for specific investments are rarely effective in inducing businesses to make those investments.

D
如果认定A,B之间的关系是(NOT)A->B(不是A导致B),其背后的假设是,其他条件相同下,如果没有A也会导致B(或者NOT B不会发生).

请问以上这段话如何具体理解。
收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
 楼主| 发表于 2010-5-18 00:06:38 | 只看该作者
up
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-9 01:21
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部