OG12-104，请指导

627031125

OG答案解释，

If the stores that were driven out by Colson’s were replaced mostly by discount stores, that
suggests that the stores were replaced because of a need that no longer exists after the
opening of SpendLess.

第一句：由于S打折店，G打折店关，但是位置不会空（这是结论）第二句：不打折店C开后，被关门的店处会开新店。


B： 不打折店C开后，被关门的店处会开新店。但是新店都是G类的店。


现在G类的店又被S店消灭了，所以拿什么来支持这个结论呢。


实在看不懂，就别费时间了，一分钟杀掉：
A many customers 无关词，杀
B stores, opened, shopping district, Colson's, discount stores，全是有关词
C 说many stores, 支持结论啊，我们要找的是weaken，杀
D poluplation 无关词，杀
E merchandise 无关词，杀

小陈冲鸭

海鸟 发表于 2009-8-20 18:32
首先理清哪句是原因 哪句是结论第一句 Although the discount stores  in Goreville's central shoppi ...

看了你的解释。。。终于弄明白了

jgtmybsg

alibaba_2009 发表于 2009-8-12 20:52
脑浆都想出来了，才想明白。原因：倒闭一个竞争力弱的店，开一个新店；结论：不会空位，即倒闭一个打折店， ...

同意！               

Charline_chang

海鸟 发表于 2009-8-20 18:32
首先理清哪句是原因 哪句是结论第一句 Although the discount stores  in Goreville's central shoppi ...

解释的太棒了，看完后豁然开朗。
这道题最关键的是找到结论。
结论：5年内竞争不过打折店S的店关闭后，地方不会空太久，会有新店入驻。
原因：C这家非打折店，在5年内，那些因竞争不过C而倒闭的店有新店开。

huo_f

第二句在支持第一句，C non-dis，在一些与C竞争失败的地方，都有新开店铺。
在与S竞争失败的地方应该也会新开（not vacant for long）

但是，C与S不同，C 为非打折，S为打折。C周围开的都是打折店铺 。而S已经把打折店铺竞争掉了。说明S这个地方的打折店铺 已经饱和了。

故，C的情况不适用于S。

张什么昆来着

还是搞不懂啊

Bensontuo

bubumouse 发表于 2009-8-12 13:17
Although the discount stores  in Goreville's central shopping district are expected to close wi ...

OG 12-104

Spot the question type - Weaken

Shall we weaken the conclusion or shall we weaken the premises ? None !!!

We shall weaken the " assumptions " that argument made.

The assumption argument made is - There are no any discount store could survive If the stores were opened nearby C.

The necessary assumption is ( there should not be any " discount stores " opened nearby C ),  and all we have to do is to negate the argument. - At least one discount store opened nearby C.

B is the perfect answer.

半酒凡槽

我就想问一下。。。这s店和c店是在同一个街上吗？
If the stores that were driven out by Colson’s were replaced mostly by discount stores, that suggests that the stores were replaced because of a need that no longer exists after the opening of SpendLess.
og这解释又是啥哦。。。
想哭

小马过河0066

半酒凡槽 发表于 2019-8-18 17:07
我就想问一下。。。这s店和c店是在同一个街上吗？
If the stores that were driven out by Colson’s were ...

没有

小马过河0066

Argument: S周围的地不会空着

C正价店开业的日子里-->挤走C周围的正价店-->所以C周围的有空地给新（折扣）店开业（因为正价店肯定开不走）
类比推理，
S折扣店在CSD区开业-->挤走CSD区其他折扣店-->留出空地—>新（正价）店会在空地开业（因为折扣店肯定开不走）

B：CSD开的都是折扣店