|
GWD25-Q3. Mel: The official salary for judges has always been too low to attract the best candidates to the job. The legislature’s move to raise the salary has done nothing to improve the situation, because it was coupled with a ban on receiving money for lectures and teaching engagements. Pat: No, the raise in salary really does improve the situation. Since very few judges teach or give lectures, the ban will have little or no negative effect. Pat’s response to Mel is inadequate in that it A. attempts to assess how a certain change will affect potential members
of a group by providing evidence about its effect on the current members. B. mistakenly takes the cause of a certain change to be an effect of that change C. attempts to argue that a certain change will have a positive effect merely by pointing to the absence of negative effects D. simply denies Mel’s claim without putting forward any evidence in support
of that denial E. assumes that changes that benefit the most able members of a group
necessarily benefit all members of that group. 之前的帖子，没有人讨论过为什么E不对，很困惑E错在哪里？
[此贴子已经被作者于2009/7/30 11:17:42编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2009-7-30 11:17:00
楼主
