prep 2-139 对语法笔记正确选项解释的疑问

aeoluseros

突然想到，called一定是插入语，要不然located前面的逗号是多余的。

dingxiang

以下是引用AlienX在2008-8-19 0:25:00的发言：
回46:

沒錯, 可以加and, 可是也可以不加, 可是有區別
1. 加的話called the taste pore跟located at the top of taste bud是非限定修opening
2. 不加的話called the taste pore是非限定修opening, 而located at the top of taste bud是非限定修opening
妳可以看看32樓的post.

只听说过 加逗号来区分限定非限定的

你的说法很新鲜

我持保留意见

anyway，不争了，

dingxiang

以下是引用rorarora在2008-8-17 20:17:00的发言：

找到两个例子，先放在这：

Asset allocators create portfolios, often in the form of mutual funds, with the intention to turn in good results in both “bull” and “bear” markets.

(A)   with the intention

(B)   the intention of which is

(C)   intended

(D)   and intending

(E)    so intended as

Ans--(C)

The Anasazi settlements at Chaco Canyon were built on a spectacular scale with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each, were connected by a complex regional system of roads.

A. with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each, were

B. with more than 75 carefully engineered structures, of up to 600 rooms each,

C. of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms, each that had been

D. of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms and with each

E. of more than 75 carefully engineered structures of up to 600 rooms each had been

Ans--(B)

fine,

第二个确实跳过插入语

但还是说服不了我们argue的这道题目的情况

AlienX

ummm..那一道?

AlienX

一個有名的美國語法教授對大全120的看法, 供參考:
“An attempt to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment, begun almost two decades ago, has been unsuccessful despite efforts by many important groups, including the National Organization for Women”,
the participial phrase ("begun almost two decades ago") is functioning adjectivally: it is modifying the
noun “attempt,” which is first modified by an adjectival infinitive phrase (“to ratify the Equal Rights Amendment”).  So this is a case in which a noun is being modified by two consecutive adjectival phrases—an infinitive phrase and a participial phrase.  It is not uncommon for a noun to be modified by more than one adjectival phrase.

可是他不是教GMAT, 所以可能會跟"GMAT Grammar"不一致....

zjpopo

UP~

大家讨论的热火朝天，有这股劲头我们一定可以Crack G!

jonathan1987

我觉得lz更合理些,如果called 和 located  都修饰前面的 中心词projection的话,中间应该有个连词and才对的吧

liming21

总结：

-ING分词短语在后，优先做伴随状语可能修饰主句谓语动词

句子，-ED 分词短语结构，优先考虑-ED分词短语做定语就近修饰名词。

注意：是优先

先就近后跳跃，依照逻辑意思定，不能太死了

个人意见

ouyangkehai

看了还是好晕啊！我把我的理解说一下，请指正！我支持DINGXIANG的说法，即就近修饰，原因有：

1）假设CALLED是插入语，located修饰opening,容易让读者有产生修饰taste pore的歧义，而这是GMAT最忌讳的，OG10解释中反复强调这个原则，甚至逻辑意思比这简单清楚的题都强调不能有任何歧义，况且是这个逻辑上修饰哪个都讲得通的，所以唯一的就是就近修饰不会有任何歧义。

2）也许有人会说如果是就近修饰那就不要逗号了，我认为这里是非限定性修饰，不要逗号则为限定性修饰，两者都没错。

3）大家对called修饰the opening 都没意见，从逻辑意思上来说taste pore是对opening的专业解释，即特指专业名词，要说明这个东西的具体位置，我想taste pore就成了中心词，从而就从另一方面佐证修饰opening不合理。就如中文：班上有50个同学，一个同学叫张三，家住狗毛村。最后一句说的是张三而不是同学，呵呵，犯了逻辑类比错误！

拙见！

songlovegt

不同意楼上，既然承认“CALLED’’是插入语了，就没有修饰歧义的可能。
支持两位版主，localed 修饰 opening.