I was also wrong, as I did not understand the word "misleading" thoroughly, but after studied it, now I know. the point from the author is below according to my analysis: 1 However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw. "Since irradiated food is eaten", talking about cooking is rather not to the point/not to the center of the discussion. 2 Since author has pointed out at the first step of "beside the point" that much irradiated food is eaten raw, then if proponent talking about "food that is both irradiated and cooked", it is rather directing people who knows little about irradiated food to the wrong direction, as it's out of the scope too far. What author essentially meant is that one should now tell people to cook irradiated food at all. Therefore, to point out a misleading position, the answer should be E. |