ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主:
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[梦之队日记] 9月group 1 问题讨论贴

[复制链接]
131#
发表于 2008-9-11 01:44:00 | 只看该作者

哦,明白了。

132#
发表于 2008-9-11 04:19:00 | 只看该作者
我最近做Feifei, 也有个问题不明白,这里贴出来队友们给帮忙看看.

    

107. Because of
the recent transformation of the market, Quore, Inc., must increase the next
two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s
production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is
possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.


    

 


    

If the
statements above are true, which one of the following must on the basis of them
also be true?


    

 


    

A.       
It is only Quore’s production
structure that makes it possible for Quore to survive the transformation of the
market.


    

B.       
Quore will not go bankrupt if
it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.


    

C.       
If the market had not been
transformed, Quore would have required no productivity increase in order to
avoid bankruptcy.


    

D.      
Because of the transformation
of the market, Quore will achieve a productivity increase of 10 percent over
the next two years.


    

E.       
If a 20 percent productivity
increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.


    
答案是E, 可是我觉得C还是挺对的啊, 看了详解版说什么逆否之类一大堆, 还是没有理解...
E如果不说20%我也觉得对, 可是他说了20%我觉得把范围缩小了.
题目只是说要增长, 10%和20%只是一个举例说明公司的structure, 只要增长就可以不用bankrupcy, 不见得非要20%这么高的增长率要求啊...
大家觉得呢?
133#
发表于 2008-9-11 06:14:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用caojie8182在2008-9-11 4:19:00的发言:

107. Because of
the recent transformation of the market, Quore, Inc., must increase the next
two years
, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s
production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is
possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.

I think some information is missing here.

It's odd to say one company "will increasee". I think the peaker meant to say " will increase (... in) the next two years.

134#
发表于 2008-9-11 07:06:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用caojie8182在2008-9-11 4:19:00的发言:
我最近做Feifei, 也有个问题不明白,这里贴出来队友们给帮忙看看.

 

107. Because of
the recent transformation of the market, Quore, Inc., must increase the next
two years, or it will certainly go bankrupt. In fact, however, Quore’s
production structure is such that if a 10 percent productivity increase is
possible, then a 20 percent increase is attainable.


 


 

If the
statements above are true, which one of the following must on the basis of them
also be true?


 


 

A.       
It is only Quore’s production
structure that makes it possible for Quore to survive the transformation of the
market.


 

B.       
Quore will not go bankrupt if
it achieves a productivity increase of 20 percent over the next two years.


 

C.       
If the market had not been
transformed, Quore would have required no productivity increase in order to
avoid bankruptcy.


 

D.      
Because of the transformation
of the market, Quore will achieve a productivity increase of 10 percent over
the next two years.


 

E.       
If a 20 percent productivity
increase is unattainable for Quore, then it must go bankrupt.


 
答案是E, 可是我觉得C还是挺对的啊, 看了详解版说什么逆否之类一大堆, 还是没有理解...
E如果不说20%我也觉得对, 可是他说了20%我觉得把范围缩小了.
题目只是说要增长, 10%和20%只是一个举例说明公司的structure, 只要增长就可以不用bankrupcy, 不见得非要20%这么高的增长率要求啊...
大家觉得呢?

题目不全吧?

135#
发表于 2008-9-13 06:11:00 | 只看该作者

OG11逻辑98题。第一句里的other than不知道怎么翻译好。

Hotco oil burners, designed to be used in asphalt plants, are so efficient that Hotco will sell one to the Clifton Asphalt for no payment other than cost saving between the total amount the asphalt plant actually paid for oil using its former burner during the last two years and the total amount it will pay for oil using the Hotco burner during the next two years.

136#
发表于 2008-9-13 10:43:00 | 只看该作者
other than 除了
137#
发表于 2008-9-13 10:55:00 | 只看该作者

binggo!明白了。

刚才我也是用除了来翻译的,但怎么翻怎么不对劲。这会再看一下子就清楚了。

奇怪。

138#
发表于 2008-9-13 13:01:00 | 只看该作者
有时候就是这样,死盯着看半天也搞不清楚,放一放,再去看就明白了。
139#
发表于 2008-9-14 06:51:00 | 只看该作者

麻烦帮忙看道逻辑

63. Some good cooks are gourmet cooks who pride themselves on always using extravagantly rich ingredients in elaborate recipes. Some good cooks can be characterized as fast-food cooks. They may use rich ingredients as long as the recipes are easy to follow and take little time. Other good cooks are health food enthusiasts, who are concerned primarily with the nutritional value of food. But even though not all good cooks are big eaters, they all enjoy preparing and serving food. 

 

If the information in the passage is true, which one of the following CANNOT be true? 

 

A.       Most good cooks do not use extravagantly rich ingredients. 

B.        Everyone who enjoys preparing and serving food is a good cook. 

C.        More good cooks who use extravagantly rich ingredients are big eaters than are good cooks who do not use such ingredients. 

D.       There are fewer good cooks who enjoy serving and preparing food than there are good cooks who are big eaters. 

E.        Gourmet cooks, fast-food cooks, and cooks who are health food enthusiasts are all big eaters. 

 

A.        原文的第一句,从原文推出。

B.         从结论可以推出。

C.         推不出这种比较,无关。

D.        正确。结论:但是即使并非所有的好厨师是big eaters,他们却全都喜欢准备和供应食物。说明喜欢准备和供应食物的好厨师的人数更多,是big eaters的好厨师的人数相比较少。D选项与原文的结论相反。

E.         从原文推出。
我怎么觉得每个都不对啊~~

140#
发表于 2008-9-14 13:45:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用lazzycat_wxh在2008-9-14 6:51:00的发言:

麻烦帮忙看道逻辑

63. Some good cooks are gourmet cooks who pride themselves on always using extravagantly rich ingredients in elaborate recipes. Some good cooks can be characterized as fast-food cooks. They may use rich ingredients as long as the recipes are easy to follow and take little time. Other good cooks are health food enthusiasts, who are concerned primarily with the nutritional value of food. But even though not all good cooks are big eaters, they all enjoy preparing and serving food. 

 

If the information in the passage is true, which one of the following CANNOT be true? 

 

A.       Most good cooks do not use extravagantly rich ingredients. 

B.        Everyone who enjoys preparing and serving food is a good cook. 

C.        More good cooks who use extravagantly rich ingredients are big eaters than are good cooks who do not use such ingredients. 

D.       There are fewer good cooks who enjoy serving and preparing food than there are good cooks who are big eaters. 

E.        Gourmet cooks, fast-food cooks, and cooks who are health food enthusiasts are all big eaters. 

 

A.        原文的第一句,从原文推出。

B.         从结论可以推出。

C.         推不出这种比较,无关。

D.        正确。结论:但是即使并非所有的好厨师是big eaters,他们却全都喜欢准备和供应食物。说明喜欢准备和供应食物的好厨师的人数更多,是big eaters的好厨师的人数相比较少。D选项与原文的结论相反。

E.         从原文推出。
我怎么觉得每个都不对啊~~

D对的啊!不是有解释么。你觉得D哪里不对呢。

这种cannot be true的,只要认为他是true,然后与题目对照有没有冲突就行了。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2026-1-22 10:55
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部