这个BOLDFACE题目究竟是什么啊？

吴羽若

看了半天也没明白到底怎么回事，哪位帮我解释下吧，谢谢了！

五月十三

好像是问boldface的句子在整段话中的作用，属于考察结构的题目。

OG11里面好像没有遇到过。

五月十三

有例题，来个做做嘛？

吴羽若

OMG！Boldface到底指什么呢？

五月十三

以下是引用吴羽若在2008-6-25 17:28:00的发言：
OMG！Boldface到底指什么呢？

BF - 1、BoldFace题的简称，又叫黑脸题。是CR题型出题方式中的一种，一般是题目叙述中有1~2句的黑体字，问这1~2句话在整段叙述中所起的作用，此类题目一般较难，有遇见BF题即为高分的说法，但不完全准确。
2、Boy Friend...^_^

参见置顶帖。

吴羽若

谢谢楼上的解答，总算明白了~~

我还没碰到过这种题目呢。

五月十三

以下是引用吴羽若在2008-6-27 11:24:00的发言：
谢谢楼上的解答，总算明白了~~

我还没碰到过这种题目呢。

来一道给你做做。

Historian: Newton developed mathematical concepts and techniques that are fundamental to modern calculus. Leibniz developed closely analogous concepts and techniques. It has traditionally been thought that these discoveries were independent. Researchers have, however, recently discovered notes of Leibniz’ that discuss one of Newton’s books on mathematics. Several scholars have argued that since the book includes a presentation of Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques, and since the notes were written before Leibniz’ own development of calculus concepts and techniques, it is virtually certain that the traditional view is false. A more cautious conclusion than this is called for, however. Leibniz’ notes are limited to early sections of Newton’s book, sections that precede the ones in which Newton’s calculus concepts and techniques are presented.

In the historian’s reasoning, the two boldfaced portions play which of the following roles?

 

A、The first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends; the second is evidence that has been used to support an opposing position.

B、The first provides evidence in support of the overall position that the historian defends; the second is that position.

C、The first provides evidence in support of an intermediate conclusion that is drawn to provide support for the overall position that the historian defends; the second provides evidence against that intermediate conclusion.

D、The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is evidence offered in support of the historian’s own position.

E、The first is evidence that has been used to support a conclusion that the historian criticizes; the second is further information that substantiates that evidence.