ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: rabbitbug
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[SC总结] 关于twice的用法

[精华] [复制链接]
31#
发表于 2007-10-15 16:06:00 | 只看该作者

C. twice what it was in   里面这个 IT 指代上面啊??

ABDE 是都有问题, 可哪位能帮我 搞清楚这个 WHAT 从句到底是个上面结构, 后面证明有个IT?

32#
发表于 2007-10-15 16:06:00 | 只看该作者
这个 WHAT 从句到底是个什么结构?  后面怎么有个 IT??
33#
发表于 2007-10-15 16:14:00 | 只看该作者

 鄙人愚见, 不是what= the thing that 吗 , 那 应该是 twice what was in 才对吧

请N人指正.

34#
发表于 2008-1-14 10:41:00 | 只看该作者

...

好精彩的讨论..

所以说since what it was 是OK的~那么 double what it was 呢? double可以作动词么?

类似考点出有一题..

A survey by the National Council of Churches showed that in 1986 there were 20,736 female ministers, almost 9 percent of the nation's clergy, twice as much
    as 1977.

            

A)twice as much as 1977

B)twice as many as 1977

C)double what it was in 1977

D)double the figure for 1977

E)a number double that of 1977's

请问..如果A在1977前面加个in是不是就正确选项了? C错哪儿了呢~
35#
发表于 2008-1-22 19:16:00 | 只看该作者
double可以當動詞使用,例句(1):Their house has doubled in value since they bought it.  (2)The government is threatening to double the tax on liquor.

(A)要改成正確選項的話,much要改成many,因為ministers是可數名詞,在1997前面加上in就可以了

(C)按照OG給的解釋是說what it was is awkward ,wordy, and unclear.以前看到what it was就直接排除,但是看到樓主大全885裡面的例題,好像也不能這麼斷然就排除what it was的選項,不知道有哪位牛牛可以具體解釋一下

36#
发表于 2008-1-23 14:11:00 | 只看该作者

可是还是有疑问:it 是代词,本身是不能带冠词,所以也就不需要冠词

37#
发表于 2008-2-6 22:45:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用深海的小美人鱼在2003-12-30 4:14:00的发言:
举个例子
he is twice as strong as he was。注意比较对象
A中是twice as fast as the 1970’s
在这里是rate和1970's比较,是不对的
B中用it指代很模糊,
只有c正确比较,而且没有歧义。

But the Logman dictionary said:

    They employ 90 people, twice as many as last year

   Interest rates are twice as high as those of our competitors.

could you please explain it again?

38#
发表于 2008-2-7 20:24:00 | 只看该作者
关于C指代it,OG4中倍数关系是修饰20,738 female ministers中这个数量,og解释中有“Double the figure for 1977 places the focus on the number and correctly completes the comparison.“可以为证。故what it was错在指代歧异。

而对于OG中”What it was is awkward, wordy, and unclear“ ,其实What it was 只是相对the figure罗嗦,GMAT中不认最好,只认相对好,很business的逻辑啊:-)

所以what指代的主从并不一定都错的。这点还需总结完善~

39#
发表于 2008-5-18 11:53:00 | 只看该作者
晕啊。。。。。。。
40#
发表于 2008-5-18 19:56:00 | 只看该作者
mark
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

IESE MBA
近期活动

正在浏览此版块的会员 ()

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-22 16:33
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部