半岛姐妹复习日记

大洋彼岸369

姐妹们给看个SC哈, 先谢过了

Only seven people this century have been killed by the great white shark, the man-eater of the movies—less than those killed by bee stings.

 

A.   movies—less than those

B.   movies—fewer than have been

C.   movies, which is less than those

D.   movies, a number lower than the people

E.    movies, fewer than the ones

这题目答案在B/E有争议,偶认为如果考试碰上了,选B比较好吧. B中fewer than (those who)have been killed by bee stings.我觉得省略了those who. E中的时态跟前面不并列,而且the ones用的感觉突兀. 姐妹们讨论哈.

qianrene

the ones容易误解为seven people,而且fewer than容易误解为修饰前面的movies所以加个破折号表示解释主句的主语fewer就修饰了only seven people选B

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=241214&page=1

JMS帮忙看看这题，我拿不准~加油啊，洋洋，小F，洁洁，白白，还有宝宝，没有多少时间了，申请已经开始了！

再来一题，没人回我5555求救~

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardID=24&ID=281265&page=1

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-10-13 11:13:17编辑过]

qianrene

以下是引用blackblue在2007-10-13 9:29:00的发言：

Which of the following most logically completes the argument?

 

The irradiation of food kills bacteria and thus retards spoilage.  However, it also lowers the nutritional value of many foods.  For example, irradiation destroys a significant percentage of whatever vitamin B1 a food may contain.  Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking.  However, this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw, or else misleading, since _______.

 

1. many of the proponents of irradiation are food distributors who gain from food’s having a longer shelf life
2. it is clear that killing bacteria that may be present on food is not the only effect that irradiation has
3. cooking is usually the final step in preparing food for consumption, whereas irradiation serves to ensure a longer shelf life for perishable foods
4. certain kinds of cooking are, in fact, even more destructive of vitamin B1 than carefully controlled irradiation is
5. for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded

 这道题真的很晕，MM们帮忙解解

看需要反驳的结论：Proponents of irradiation point out that irradiation is no worse in this respect than cooking说微波杀菌和烹调的效果一样

两方面反驳：

1）this fact is either beside the point, since much irradiated food is eaten raw（指出两者的效果没有可比性，因为好多食物只经过了微波杀菌）

2）or else misleading, since for food that is both irradiated and cooked, the reduction of vitamin B1 associated with either process individually is compounded.（指出微波杀菌和烹调对降低VB的效果糅合在一起了，根本分辨不出来）

所以无从判断这两者哪个对VB的降低效果更大

jiejie219

那道SC我觉得选B,感觉破折号在这里比逗号将句子的意思分的更清楚，破折号后面的话指的是破折号前面的整个句子。

jiejie219

宝儿，不好意思，我的逻辑实在太差，目前只有学习的份儿。

小猪sisi

复习了一个半月了，今天终于鼓起勇气作了一套prep

结果，m50 错6个

     v 29 错了17个

7个sc 2个cr 8个rc  (只有三篇阅读，估计那机器没简单题给我做了，遇见的差不多都是主旨题）

想请教一下兄弟姐妹们，怎么样才能提高我的sc呢和rc

平常作gwd也是差不多这水平，但有时候运气好，sc就只错3、4个（不算重题）

我感觉我的问题就在于sc浮动太大，rc已经全部失去信心

怎么样才能培养sc的感觉呢？

就快考试了，救救我吧

我目标不高，700以上就行

qianrene

一题一题的分析OG吧，把语法点抠出来，另外加上破解prep，应该可以提高一些，外加练习GWD阅读的逻辑图提高SC的阅读能力；sisi MM好厉害，数学可以做到只错6个，数学是怎么复习的呀？

小猪sisi

我是学理的，就是把题目看懂

翻译出来难度不超过初中知识

但是要仔细全面地思考

我经常栽倒陷阱了，看到答案恍然大悟

具体来说，既然是做选择题，就没必要太注意方法

我就是怎么简单怎么来

有些ds题，直接举例，就能很快否定，如果你举上三四个例子都能证明的话，拿这个就差不多是sufficient的题了

这个方法不是很建议用，不过非常时期，实在不会算了的时候可以使用，但是练习完还是要找到正确的解题方法

还有些云里雾里不知道题目再说什么的时候，我就根据他说的数字在那，胡乱组合来猜，他给的数是干什么的，他要问什么

一般能搞定答案。

但是以上的方法真的是歪门邪道，可以帮助你蒙对5道题左右

剩下的基础题还是看你的认真仔细程度了

blackblue

宝儿的解释好清楚啊

spzeng

1.         GWD-17-Q23

Because visual inspection cannot reliably distinguish certain skin discolorations from skin cancers, dermatologists at clinics have needed to perform tests of skin tissue taken from patients.  At Westville Hospital, dermatological diagnostic costs were reduced by the purchase of a new imaging machine that diagnoses skin cancer in such cases as reliably as the tissue tests do.  Consequently, even though the machine is expensive, a dermatological clinic in Westville is considering buying one to reduce diagnostic costs.

 

Which of the following would it be most useful for the clinic to establish in order to make its decision?

 

1. Whether the visits of patients who require diagnosis of skin discolorations tend to be shorter in duration at the clinic than at the hospital
     
2. Whether the principles on which the machine operates have been known to science for a long time
     
3. Whether the machine at the clinic would get significantly less heavy use than the machine at the hospital does
     
4. Whether in certain cases of skin discoloration, visual inspection is sufficient to make a diagnosis of skin cancer
     
5. Whether hospitals in other parts of the country have purchased such imaging machines

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&replyID=1973900&id=211519&skin=0

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-10-13 21:41:05编辑过]