GWD17-Q34，Q9

jkzlg

针对lz的疑惑:" 我认为E和题目没有关系，人家的argument说的是poses no serious threat to the migrating shorebird populations，又没说the success of the shorebird's breeding"

要读仔细题哦...重心不是migrating.而是population.也就是鸟的数量. 鸟的数量和什么有关. 当然就是和breeding生殖有关啦.  所以要weaken的是"因为呆久了能保证迁徙, 能保证迁徙之后的生殖,所以egg少不会影响数量"这一推理. 我记得有一种weaken方式是通过反对文中假设: 如原文认为因为A所以B, 但实际上是A非但没有导致B反而阻止B的实现, 从而weaken.
而本题E的选项就是证明A(呆久一点) 不利于B(生殖),所以weaken了" poses no serious threat  to population"这一结论.
希望有帮助啦~

若雪

Reading comprehension.

Conclusion: This decline, however, poses no serious threat to the migrating shorebird populations.

migrating shorebird populations, this is not THIS year's population. This the population of this species!

-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/8/5 12:22:24)

内个...我知道可能有点钻牛角尖哈。。可是我还是想不明白额。。不是说的是migrating shorebird的populations么。。。migrating shorebird不是今年的那些迁徙的鸟么。。为什么会是整体鸟的数量呢。。。加个migrating是干嘛的？？


谢谢噢。。。。！！

wycg

E 其实就是在说,birds越早动身迁徙,越有可能吃到足够的eggs,从而成功完成迁徙.
the eariler, the more likely. 就是说越晚走,越没吃的, 越不可能成功完成迁徙.
还是在说egg数两不足. 削弱题干

sdcar2010

One-child policy poses no threat to the growing Chinese population because it only affect the size of the next generation for years to come.

Is this above statement valid? Is the word population llimited to the current head count ONLY?

Reading comprehension.

Conclusion: This decline, however, poses no serious threat to the migrating shorebird populations.

migrating shorebird populations, this is not THIS year's population. This the population of this species!

-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/8/5 12:22:24)

内个...我知道可能有点钻牛角尖哈。。可是我还是想不明白额。。不是说的是migrating shorebird的populations么。。。migrating shorebird不是今年的那些迁徙的鸟么。。为什么会是整体鸟的数量呢。。。加个migrating是干嘛的？？


谢谢噢。。。。！！

-- by 会员 若雪 (2011/8/6 1:04:25)

若雪

One-child policy poses no threat to the growing Chinese population because it only affect the size of the next generation for years to come.

Is this above statement valid? Is word population llimited to the current head count ONLY?

Reading comprehension.

Conclusion: This decline, however, poses no serious threat to the migrating shorebird populations.

migrating shorebird populations, this is not THIS year's population. This the population of this species!

-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/8/5 12:22:24)

内个...我知道可能有点钻牛角尖哈。。可是我还是想不明白额。。不是说的是migrating shorebird的populations么。。。migrating shorebird不是今年的那些迁徙的鸟么。。为什么会是整体鸟的数量呢。。。加个migrating是干嘛的？？


谢谢噢。。。。！！

-- by 会员 若雪 (2011/8/6 1:04:25)

-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/8/6 11:29:59)

我默默的。。来回答了。。不valid. 我理解是因为growing是逐渐增长的。。没有尽头的那种。。所以包括未来的next generation. 我觉得题目中migrating作为定语修饰bird population，应该不会他们一直迁移到永远没有结束吧。。所以才觉得特指他们这次迁移的鸟.....
好像脑子就是转不过来。。。咳咳。。。。不好意思吖。。又要麻烦sdcar了。。。>_<!

sdcar2010

One-child policy poses no threat to the Chinese population because it only affect the size of the next generation for years to come.

Is this above statement valid? Is the word population llimited to the current head count ONLY?

若雪

One-child policy poses no threat to the Chinese population because it only affect the size of the next generation for years to come.

Is this above statement valid? Is the word population llimited to the current head count ONLY?

-- by 会员 sdcar2010 (2011/8/7 3:45:01)

不valid。。。population包括未来的。。。

scarlettshaw

up

gigi68788

17-9.
B. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.
Here, the scheduled projects are those which are not cancelled.
If most of the scheduled projects - i.e. not cancelled projects - which are identified as wasteful were in the districts controlled by the President's party while most cancelled projects are from the districts controlled by opposition partyes, it implies that these projects are handled to benefit to the districts controlled by President's party. It will contradict to what the secretary said - "So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary policy, not partisan politics."
So the secretary has to make this assumption in order to make her conclusion true.

-- by 会员 rockytundra (2007/8/22 12:31:00)

大概明白是什么意思了～
但是题目真的奇怪，The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful     为什么wasteful还scheduled呢？