ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
本题详情

本贴相关题目 OG (HYAD)

00:00:00

A researcher studying drug addicts found that, on average, they tend to manipulate other people a great deal more than nonaddicts do. The researcher concluded that people who frequently manipulate other people are likely to become addicts.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researcher's conclusion?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 3584|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

【求助】OG15题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-8-6 11:22:00 | 只看该作者

【求助】OG15题

15. A researcher studying drug addicts found that, on average, they
tend to manipulate other people a great deal more than nonaddicts do.
The researcher concluded that people who frequently manipulate other
people are likely to become addicts.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the researcher's conclusion?
(A)    After becoming addicted to drugs, drug addicts learn to manipulate other people as a way of obtaining drugs.
(B)  
 When they are imprisoned, drug addicts often use their ability to
manipulate other people to obtain better living conditions.
(C)    Some nonaddicts manipulate other people more than some addicts do.
(D)  
 eople who are likely to become addicts exhibit unusual behavior
patterns other than frequent manipulation of other people.
(E)  
 The addicts that the researcher studied were often unsuccessful in
obtaining what they wanted when they manipulated other people.

不知道是不是我没有读懂,A选项不是增强么?我觉得C才是削弱。请指教
[此贴子已经被作者于2007-8-6 12:41:13编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2007-8-6 12:07:00 | 只看该作者
题中说people who manipulate othere people 更容易上瘾;(即A 是B的原因)
A:说上瘾是manipulate other people 的原因 (即B是A的原因),所以是削弱
D; 是无关,本文的focus是manipulation,是不是还有其他的behaviorpattern is not the focus of this problem.

板凳
发表于 2007-8-6 12:42:00 | 只看该作者

A是列出他因,削弱

D是无关选项,直接削弱作者的事实,那是错误削弱

地板
发表于 2007-8-6 12:46:00 | 只看该作者
A中并没有他因,削弱题型中有一种可以预测答案的就是这种,题中说A是B的原因,选项中说B是A的原因, 及因果颠倒削弱
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-6 12:52:00 | 只看该作者
写错了,应该是C

题中写:addict trend manipulate others (A->B),因此 who frenquently manipulate others are likely to be addict (B->A)。
由于 A是B的充分条件,却不一定是必要条件,所以只要给出反例就能weak

A: 解释了addict trend manipulate others,即解释了A,所以我认为是增强;
C: some noneaddict manuplate others too,即给出了反例,所以委任我是削弱

你觉得呢?
6#
发表于 2007-8-6 13:24:00 | 只看该作者
文中的推理是由一个事实trend to manipulate others 推出they aer likely to be addict.的结论。

我个人认为C并不能削弱结论。即便some none addict manuplate others too 也不能推翻事实, 平均来讲,addict trend to manipulate compared to none addict.所以不对结论有任何的威胁

欢迎讨论!

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2007-8-6 15:42:00 | 只看该作者
你说的有道理
但我还是不明白A为什么会削弱
8#
发表于 2007-8-6 19:59:00 | 只看该作者

原文说:爱操纵别人的人易有毒品成瘾倾向。

A:成瘾后的人,通过操纵别人取得drugs.

削弱因果有四点:给出他因,有因无果,有果无因,因果倒置

A为因果倒置。

有道题说夫妻睡眠周期不一致导致关系不和,和此类似。

原文说:夫妻睡眠周期不一致导致关系不和。

削弱的答案是:其实是因为关系不和,才导致夫妻选择与对方不同时睡眠。

错误答案:夫妻睡眠周期相同的也会关系不和。

回到你问的题目,细想一下,A削弱的程度比C大,它彻底推翻了结论,原来成瘾者不是主观意愿要操纵别人。C部分承认了有些成瘾者会操纵人。

9#
发表于 2007-8-7 01:51:00 | 只看该作者
zjflora mm讲的很详细...
10#
发表于 2007-8-7 08:48:00 | 只看该作者

我不明白为什么D不可以?

yyisme在3楼讲“D是无关选项,直接削弱作者的事实,那是错误削弱”,这是什么意思?难道说削弱事实不是削弱?我刚开始复习,所以不是很明白。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-30 00:30
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部