GWD17-Q9 急救

Tira

10. GWD17-Q9:

Press Secretary:  Our critics claim that the President’s recent highway project cancellations取消 demonstrate a vindictive 报仇desire to punish legislative有立法权
                districts 区controlled by opposition parties.  They offer as evidence the fact that 90 percent of the projects canceled were in such districts.  But all of the canceled projects had been identified as wasteful in a report written by respected nonpartisan auditors.  So the President’s choice was clearly motivated by sound budgetary按预算支配 policy, not partisan politics.

 

Which of the following is an assumption on which the press secretary’s argument depends?

 

1. Canceling highway projects was not the only way for the President to punish legislative districts controlled by opposition parties.
2. The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful in the report were not mostly projects in districts controlled by the President’s party.
3. The number of projects canceled was a significant proportion of all the highway projects that were to be undertaken by the government in the near future.
4. The highway projects canceled in districts controlled by the President’s party were not generally more expensive than the projects canceled in districts controlled by opposition parties.
5. Reports by nonpartisan auditors are not generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.

答案是B  请教一下  我选的E

Tira

睡前顶一下 希望有NN看到

Tira

.

easylau

偶不是NN。。。

我的理解是，B选项先去掉not，是说大部分被鉴定为是浪费但却预备实施（没有被cancel）的project都是在prezident自己党派的控制区域，那就说明president是出于党派利益考虑的，那就weaken了原文的结论。

Not＋weaken，即是构成assumption了。

Tira

谢谢

qianrene

该选E吧

Press Secretary说：因为NON PARTISAN的意见说他们就是“浪费工程”，所以政府不是出与对那个地区的政治压迫才取消工程的

必须要假设NON PARTISAN不是政府一伙的，他们的意见必须是权威和客观中立的，这个结论才能成立

PS：为什么CD13套以后的讨论这么少啊？

B：即便假设了这些工程是那些“对立政府地区”的，那么政府就更有可能对他们进行政治限制了啊

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-10-12 16:06:52编辑过]

Winterfish

提起来请牛牛再分析一下。

这个参考答案B太别扭了。The scheduled highway projects 这个东东原文中根本没有，这里出现是不是超出原文的限定范围了？逻辑题很忌讳转移对象的。

lisy

是B啊，如果这个政客引用的那个NON PARTISAN的书里提到的The scheduled highway projects identified as wasteful 很多是这个政党这边的地区的，那他才不会说呢，搬起石头砸自己脚阿，他要是说了，他这边说完，那边就拿着这本书来让总统把他们区里的wasteful 的计划也取消了。

（我觉得有时候这不是逻辑，是。。。。。）

linchenghui

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?BoardID=24&replyID=2498050&id=270754&skin=0

[此贴子已经被作者于2007-12-3 20:47:33编辑过]

ciscogeek

我也想选E.

要是去掉not，那就很漂亮了。

Reports by nonpartisan auditors are  generally regarded by the opposition parties as a source of objective assessments of government projects.