ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

"Life expectancy" is the average age at death of the entire live-born population. In the middle of the nineteenth century, life expectancy in North America was 40 years, whereas now it is nearly 80 years. Thus, in those days, people must have been considered old at an age that we now consider the prime of life.

Which of the following, if true, undermines the argument above?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2615|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

OG11-3 请教!!!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-1-24 14:57:00 | 只看该作者

OG11-3 请教!!!

今天刚开始做OG 11的逻辑就遇到困难! 请大家帮忙解决以下!!1

"Life expectancy" is the average age at death of the entire live-born population. In the middle of the nineteenth

century, life expectancy in North America was 40 years, wherreas now it is nearly 80 years. Thus, in those days,

people must have been considered old at an age that we now consider the prime of life.

Which of the following , if true, undermines the argument above?

A. In the middle of nineteenth century, the population of North America was significantly smaller than it is today.

B. Most of the gains in life expectancy in the last 150 years have come from reduction in the number of infants

who die in their first year life.

C. Many of the people who live to an advanced age today do so only because of medical technology that was

unknown in the nineteenth century.

D. The propotion of people who die in their seventies is significantly smaller today than is the proportiion of people

who die in their eighties.

E. More people in the middle of the nineteenth century engaged regularly in vigorous physical activity than do so

today.

我应该从哪里入手解这个问题呢?

沙发
发表于 2007-1-25 09:48:00 | 只看该作者

答案是b 

因为 新生儿的年龄是0 如果他们出生了就死的话 就相当于在Life expectancy 的 分子加 0 ,而 分母加1

这样Life expectancy就会变低

但这并不能代表 prime of life in the middle of the nineteenth 比现在低.....

PS: 要是解释的不好请原谅....

板凳
发表于 2007-1-25 11:58:00 | 只看该作者
LS,确定是B吗?
地板
 楼主| 发表于 2007-1-25 12:37:00 | 只看该作者

答案确实是b;

但我对以下2句话看不明白到底是什么意思? 请继续帮忙解释一下!!!

1。Thus, in those days, people must have been considered old at an age that we now consider the prime of life.

2。Most of the gains in life expectancy in the last 150 years have come from reduction in the number of infants who die in their first year life。

5#
发表于 2007-1-25 18:42:00 | 只看该作者

1.再那段时间里,在人们本来认为很老的年龄,在我们现在看来而是壮年

2.在过去的150年里,年龄的期待值的增加是由于新生儿在出生第一年的死亡率降低了

6#
发表于 2007-3-13 03:48:00 | 只看该作者

我也想不通这题目

7#
发表于 2007-3-13 14:06:00 | 只看该作者

B

LE是对广大人民群众死亡时年龄的平均值

婴儿出生就死掉的话,肯定造成平均值的大幅降低。从而40岁就是LE了。其实那时候活到70岁的人多了去了,就是婴儿死亡率拖了这个平均值的后腿。

现在婴儿都能活到老了,平均值自然上去了。

8#
发表于 2007-3-13 17:27:00 | 只看该作者
B
婴儿死亡率高导致平均寿命低,反过来想就是70的人还不少。那当时的人怎么能认为40岁就是长寿了。
他因削弱
9#
发表于 2007-3-14 05:55:00 | 只看该作者
10#
发表于 2007-3-14 06:29:00 | 只看该作者

which of the following, if ture, undermines the argument above?

削弱的是argument(论证过程,论点),不是结论。

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-12-28 06:18
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部