ChaseDream
搜索
12下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Critics of certain pollution-control regulations have claimed that the money spent over the last decade in order to reduce emissions of carbon monoxide and of volatile organic compounds has been wasted. The evidence they offer in support of this claim might appear compelling: despite the money spent, annual emissions of these pollutants have been increasing steadily. This evidence is far from adequate, however, since over the last decade a substantial number of new industrial facilities that emit these pollutants have been built.

In the reasoning given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

正确答案: D

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 6297|回复: 13
打印 上一主题 下一主题

差一天考试,请教GWD27-20黑体题

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2007-1-20 10:34:00 | 只看该作者

差一天考试,请教GWD27-20黑体题

艘了一下,可是没有找到满意的解释,就在文一词。

1.         GWD-27-Q20

Critics of certain pollution-control regulations have claimed that the money spent over the last decade in order to reduce emissions of carbon monoxide and of volatile organic compounds has been wasted.  The evidence they offer in support of this claim might appear compelling:  despite the money spent, annual emissions of these pollutants have been increasing steadily.  This evidence is far from adequate, however, since over the last decade a substantial number of new industrial facilities that emit these pollutants have been built.

                    

In the reasoning given, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

 

  1. The first identifies a claim that the reasoning seeks to show is false; the second is evidence that has been cited by others in support of that claim.

  2. The first identifies a claim that the reasoning seeks to show is false; the second is a position for which the reasoning seeks to provide support.

  3. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is a position for which the reasoning seeks to provide support.

  4. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence used to support the reasoning’s contention.

  5. The first is a position that the reasoning contends is inadequately supported by the evidence; the second is evidence that has been used to support that position.

D     为什么答案b不对那

沙发
发表于 2007-1-20 11:28:00 | 只看该作者
position是观点的意思,第二个黑体由since引出,说明是个evidence
板凳
发表于 2007-1-22 01:48:00 | 只看该作者

首先first没说错啊 只是说evidence不足

后面那个应该是evidence

地板
发表于 2007-1-22 06:43:00 | 只看该作者
d
claim that后面的内容只是陈述一个position,并没有对这个claim进行任何identify,全文也没有说这个claim是错的,只是说提出这个claim的证据不足
claim是钱花的不值,evidence是花钱但是emmision还在increase,而第二个黑体的地方是说为什么花钱了但是emmision还在increase--建了新设备,所以是support了reasoning's connection
5#
发表于 2007-1-22 08:10:00 | 只看该作者
6#
发表于 2007-1-27 17:08:00 | 只看该作者
我也选D
7#
发表于 2007-2-15 20:26:00 | 只看该作者

明白了,原来作者对是赞同waste这个观点的,我看到however我还以为他反对这个观点呢。

8#
发表于 2007-7-13 22:32:00 | 只看该作者
up
9#
发表于 2007-12-10 14:28:00 | 只看该作者
那E为何不对? D 和E 到底区别在哪里?
10#
发表于 2008-3-24 10:52:00 | 只看该作者
还是区别不了D和E
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-23 11:54
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部