ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: ycflypig
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[梦之队日记] 07年1月梦队讨论专贴 新增cc的RC突破计划

[精华] [复制链接]
121#
发表于 2006-11-16 21:35:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用DJungle在2006-11-16 1:52:00的发言:

In fact, the only countries, which actually have such laws, are farther from the equator than is the continental United States.

要求在白天开车灯的法令可以阻止撞车事故的发生。然而,由于远离赤道的国家比接近赤道的国家白天能见度低,所以这样的法令应该对这些远离赤道的国家作用大些。而事实上也正是如此,那些有白天开车灯法令的国家的确比美国大陆更远里赤道。。

好像翻译的很烂。。sorry~~

可不可以把这句话还原出来看看呢??
122#
发表于 2006-11-16 21:40:00 | 只看该作者

哦~~这里用了个倒装~~

In fact, the only countries are farther from the equator than the continental United States is far from the equator

不知道对不对呢

123#
发表于 2006-11-16 23:02:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用ycflypig在2006-11-16 11:36:00的发言:

TO gobeyond 我查了longman

1
[intransitive] to try or intend to achieve something
aim to do something
We aim to finish by Friday.
(be) aimed at doing something
an initiative aimed at reducing road accidents
aim for
We're aiming for a big improvement.
2
aim something at somebody
to say or do something that is intended for a particular person or group of people
a program that's aimed at teenagers The criticism wasn't aimed at you.
3
[intransitive and transitive] to choose the place, person etc that you want to hit or reach and point a weapon or another object towards them
Denver aimed his gun but did not shoot.
aim at/for
The pilot was aiming for the runway but came down in a nearby field.

呵呵 所以说是固定搭配


谢谢辛苦找来解释。这下我就放心了。

这个1 的 aimed at 和3.的 aim at 是不是区别于sth 还是 sb做主语?

如果是sb做主语,就是3的用法,sth主语就是1的用法了。

124#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-11-17 10:43:00 | 只看该作者

OG11版的菜鸟手册,希望对大家有用

125#
发表于 2006-11-17 22:52:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢先!
126#
发表于 2006-11-17 23:33:00 | 只看该作者

多谢老大!

127#
发表于 2006-11-18 03:12:00 | 只看该作者
能否解释下,怎么用呢?
128#
发表于 2006-11-18 03:59:00 | 只看该作者

上来冒个泡,今天又做了一下试题,比前两天好些,当然离目标还好远,阅读和语法还是很差

129#
 楼主| 发表于 2006-11-18 10:01:00 | 只看该作者

To gobeyond

先打开execl,先中第一列,在execl中 数据-筛选-自动筛选

然后在下面对每一道题目的相对应的考点,打上勾。

这样就可以整理出相同考点的题目。进行分类复习

130#
发表于 2006-11-18 10:43:00 | 只看该作者
一个CR的问题,feifei_logical里面的73题:

    

73. There is no reason why the work of scientists has to be
officially confirmed before being published. There is a system in place for the
confirmation or disconfirmation of scientific findings, namely, the replication
of results by other scientists. Poor scientific work on the part of any one
scientists, which can include anything from careless reporting practices to
fraud, is not harmful. It will be exposed and rendered harmless when other
scientists conduct experiments and obtain disconfirmatory results.


    

 


    

Which one of the following, if true, would weaken the
argument?


    

 


    

A.       
Scientific
experiments can go unchallenged for many years before they are replicated.


    

B.       
Most
scientists work in universities, where their work is submitted to peer review
before publication.


    

C.       
Most
scientists are under pressure to make their work accessible to the scrutiny of
replication.


    

D.      
In
scientific experiments, careless reporting is more common than fraud.


    

E.       
Most
scientists work as part of a team rather than alone.



我的理解是:作者强调不需要一个新的confirmation机制;那么能够weaken这个结论的应该是:某些地方就存在了这样的机制。这是我的理解,这样理解的话,我觉得在选项B中描述的大学老师经常需要相互校验的机制,应该就是weaken了作者的结论,为什么答案中说是无关选项呢?
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-17 06:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部