求助GWD26-18

singdeath

    

The situation can be split into the following three
points:

    

1. The tragedies were written in the ancient time by Euripides.
And the manuscript collection L, which was edited in Medieval times, just
included these tragedies.

    

2. When the tragedies were
published at the ancient times, the 10 “select plays”, which contain some of
Euripides’ best-known works, were added commentaries. The same 10 plays were
also included in other Medieval manuscript collections.

    

3. The other eight plays were
not added commentaries.

    

So it means that when the
other 8 plays were written in the ancient time, nobody added commentaries. So
they do not contain any ancient commentaries. Therefore, even they were later
included in some Medieval collections of manuscripts, they still don’t have any
ancient commentaries. So E is correct.

    

 

    

        
1. Some of the select plays include Euripides’
        best-known works doesn’t means that these 10 are the whole collection of
        his best-known works. So A is incorrect.

        
2. The presence of ancient commentaries in the
        select plays is not because of the fame of these plays. The paragraph does
        not provide any clue about the reason why there are ancient commentaries
        in these plays.

        
3. The choice states another thing. “Written
        about” means something like a
        book review. For example, when the plays were published, there maybe
        someone reviewing or evaluating the plays. But that is not the same as
        adding commentaries into the play, as mentioned in the paragraph.

        
4. This statement is too extreme. The paragraph
        tells us that in the manuscript collection L, Medea is accompanied by
        commentaries and Medea also appears in other medieval manuscript
        collections. But it doesn’t tell us that in other medieval collections,
        Medea also appears together with the ancient commentaries.  

    

    

NOTALOSER

我恨这种题目

alice2292

同上

12再战

顶

拉比rara

L收录了所有现存的18个希腊悲剧，10个有注释，而且这10个也被其他手稿收录，这里边儿有一些E的最出名的著作，包括MEDEA。

剩下内8个，按字母顺序排列，没有注释。其中有一篇是ELECTRA。

A．原文没有直接的证据说明只有E这个人的最好的作品才有古人的注释。排除。

B．
    这个因果关系没依据，原文不能直接推出有人写注释是因为它们是E的最出名的小说。排除。

C．
    L里面没收录不能推出没人写过。排除

D．
    人家说了M是有注释的，肯定错误。

E．
    ELECTRA并不是在任何一部中世纪的手稿中都有注释，显然L就没有，所以E很正确～

确定肯定以及一定选 E

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-4-8 17:11:02编辑过]

flyuo2006

如果"
  Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary in any extant medieval manuscript."翻译成E''E 并不是在任何中世纪的手稿里都伴随着评论出现"

那"E'E在任何中世纪的手稿中都不伴随着手稿出现"应该怎么翻译呢? 
            

难道所有这种not..any的句型都要像E中选项那样理解?　比如I don't cry in any situation,意思就是＂我并不是在任何情形下就哭＂？

其实觉得在这道题里把not..in any翻译成不是在任何．．都..来解释Ｅ是合理的，但是以后遇到这种情况该如何理解呢？比如＂I don't cry in any situation＂我就一直理解为"在任何情形下我都不会哭"

难道所有这种not..any的句型都要像E中选项那样理解?　比如I don't cry in any situation,意思就是＂我并不是在任何情形下就哭＂？

其实觉得在这道题里把not..in any翻译成不是在任何．．都..来解释Ｅ是合理的，但是以后遇到这种情况该如何理解呢？比如＂I don't cry in any situation＂我就一直理解为"在任何情形下我都不会哭"

[

[此贴子已经被作者于2009-3-30 11:20:44编辑过]

jbyupei

啊   忍不住上来说一嘴，   哪个  NOT IN ANY 是全部否定，  但是全部否定的话E仍然对，  为什么呢？

第一句话说 一本书有这么十八部作品 。   这是十八部作品。。。。怎样怎样，   

注意，这样是非限定性的，  谁说作者要表达在L中没伴随COMMENT了， 作者就是要说全部的作品中Elactora没有COMMENT ！ 第一句话就是一个引子而已。

flyuo2006

还是不太懂...jbyupei GG 可不可以忍不住说两句啊?

什么是非限定性的? 为什么是非限定性的,E就对了呢?

莫朵柒

不理解啊！不理解！！

谁再给我解释解释啊。。。

songlovegt

其实E想说: Euripides的Electra这个剧本,并不每次都是伴随这评论出现在当今现存的手稿里的( 起码在L这部手稿里,就没带评论).

E
改变一下顺序
Euripides’ Electra that was accompanied by a commentary does not appear in any extant medieval manuscript

Euripides’ Electra does not appear accompanied by a commentary in any extant medieval manuscript

appear  不及物动词 appear in ...

语法题