2006年8月队请进！欢迎大家来讨论

jenniferdsb

以下是引用liquid_84在2006-8-16 19:05:00的发言：

这里use是名词   后面不能接to do sth的吧

我刚刚用GOOGLE搜了一下,例子狂多的,你试试

http://forum.chasedream.com/dispbbs.asp?boardid=22&replyid=1770708&id=187844&page=1&skin=0&Star=7

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-16 19:12:00编辑过]

sen4sun

我又绕回Ｄ了。　

liquid_84

以下是引用sen4sun在2006-8-16 19:52:00的发言：
我又绕回Ｄ了。　

大家接着讨论

sen4sun

不过最后想想 用 to 的逻辑主语也有问题.  老大在想想. 有没有细节漏了

顾风

没有。。。当时想怎么着也得给大家贡献一道语法。。。

zimerman

请问一道语法题

GWD30-4

The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support.

 

1. have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support
2. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor

为什么B比A好

sen4sun

以下是引用顾风在2006-8-16 20:25:00的发言：
没有。。。当时想怎么着也得给大家贡献一道语法。。。

那我不想了........... ... "唉"    " 痛苦中"

jenniferdsb

以下是引用zimerman在2006-8-16 20:30:00的发言：

请问一道语法题

GWD30-4

The three women, liberal activists who strongly support legislation in favor of civil rights and environmental protection, have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support.

 

1. have consistently received labor’s unqualifying support
2. have consistently received the unqualified support of labor

为什么B比A好

在这个句子中unqualified比unqualifying意思更合适

嗯,谢谢sen指出我的错误,不然我错了还不知道呢

知错就改,查字典

unqualifed

1)not having suitable knowledge or qualification无资格的

2)not limited无条件的,绝对的

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-16 22:19:24编辑过]

sen4sun

.

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-16 22:04:31编辑过]

jiefu

TO SEN4SUN:

真的很佩服你的钻研劲儿, 强!!! (真是自愧不如, 我就寄希望碰不上该题了,嘿嘿)

我想了想, 觉得A和B都比D要来的好.

简单的说, 用TO USE THEM 多复杂啊, THEM完全没有必要出现啊,用个FOR USE 就全解决了, 简单啊! 可能这就是简捷原则吧, 虽然D可能说的更清楚,但可能没必要,所以就变罗唆拉.

供参考, 并很佩服你!!!

[此贴子已经被作者于2006-8-16 22:01:59编辑过]