请教OG-31题

wocnmm

31. Some who favor putting governmental enterprises into private hands suggest that conservation objectives
would in general be better served if private environmental groups were put in charge of operating and financing
the national park system, which is now run by the government.
Which of the following, assuming that it is a realistic possibility, argues most strongly against the suggestion
above?
A. Those seeking to abolish all restrictions on exploiting the natural resources of the parks might join the
private environmental groups as members and eventually take over their leadership.
B. Private environmental groups might not always agree on the best ways to achieve conservation objectives.
C. If they wished to extend the park system, the private environmental groups might have to seek contributions
from major donors and general public.
D. There might be competition among private environmental groups for control of certain park areas.
E. Some endangered species, such as the California condor, might die out despite the best efforts of the
private environmental groups, even if those groups are not hampered by insufficient resources.


答案：
31.
If those seeking to abolish restrictions on exploiting the natural resources of the parks assumed the leadership of
a group that was placed in charge of operating the park system, conservation objectives would not be better
served. A suggests that such a scenario might result from the proposed policy and is thus the best answer. B
indicates the potential for disagreement among various private environmental groups, but it does not suggest
that disagreements could not be resolved. C, D and E list problems that might confront private environmental
groups in charge of parks, but they do not give reason to believe that such groups would not be better able to
pursue conservation objectives than is the current administration of the park system.

可是我选了B. 上面对B的解释我觉得很弱啊。照这样， 我也可以说A的问题也可以be resolved...

dorbear

同感，要是看过PR 和 Kaplan 选项解释的感觉也是一样：隔靴搔痒。

本题是一个反面论据削弱型，提干：私企掌控 =〉有利环保
题干中没有提供任何论据，不管它，我们在选项中找到一个反向论据就行了

答案是(A)： 反对环保的人可能加入私企领导层

原题中没有任何内容要求一定要找到一个最佳环保方案，（B）不构成任何削弱。不仅如此，（B）对原命题构成一定程度加强; might not always agree = sometimes agreements could me reached. 如果本题要找一个加强选项，一定是（B），虽然不充分，但绝对的答案！

[此贴子已经被作者于2003-9-25 12:26:08编辑过]

dandan74

I think the explanation for B is weak too. The other explanation is whether the disagreement can be solved or not doesn't have direct relationship with the subject of this passage, which is "conservative objectives were better serviced". However A directly will impair this subject.

iselibra

这题我也错了，而且我也选了B，更加同样的我看了解释也不知所云。

sdfjy

虽然这题我错拉，但是我觉得OG的解释是很清楚的

某些人说：由于私人掌控，所以“conservation objective would be better serve"
against 就找即使私人掌控，conservation objective would NOT be better serve

A就是
而B的情况，即使是在政府掌控下，也很难ACHIVE THIS OBJECT，也同样有B的情况发生

我是这样理解的。

liuxuejunjx

以下是引用sdfjy在2003-10-6 4:57:00的发言：
虽然这题我错拉，但是我觉得OG的解释是很清楚的

某些人说：由于私人掌控，所以“conservation objective would be better serve"
against 就找即使私人掌控，conservation objective would NOT be better serve

A就是
而B的情况，即使是在政府掌控下，也很难ACHIVE THIS OBJECT，也同样有B的情况发生

我是这样理解的。

你的解释很有道理，同意

cocoabean

B indicates the potential for disagreement among various private environmental groups, but it does not suggest that disagreements could not be resolved. 不同意见也可以得到解决, 也可以提高conservation objectives . B莫凌两可, 可能更好, 也可能更糟, 所以不会better than before. 且题目要求 most strongly against the suggestion above.

不知大家意下如何?

流沙

我认为，B更倾向于评价，可能加强也可能削弱结论。

BiteGmat

想请问E为什么不对？

无论私人的如何努力都不能避免condor的灭亡，这不是举例说明私人企业在保护自然方面的缺陷吗？

OG：C, D and E list problems that might confront private environmental groups in charge of parks, but they do not give reason to believe that such groups would not be better able to pursue conservation objectives than is the current administration of the park system.

就是说私人在这方面可能是做不到，但可能政府也是做不到的。所以在保护condor方面不能确定私人企业会做的更好还是更坏。

如果是这样的解释，A不也有问题吗，破坏者可能会加入私人企业，那破坏者就不能加入政府并取得领导权吗，所以在这方面也不能确定私人企业会更好还是更坏

我已经晕了

BiteGmat

问题虽然很弱，也请帮助回答一下，谢谢！