ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing the tariff would seriously hamper the government's effort to reduce urban unemployment over the next five years.

Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?

正确答案: E

相关帖子

更多...

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2789|回复: 9
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请教此道天山9-2

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-12-11 22:37:00 | 只看该作者

请教此道天山9-2

Q:Kernland imposes a high tariff on the export of unprocessed cashew nuts in order to
ensure that the nuts are sold to domestic processing plants. If the tariff were lifted and
unprocessed cashews were sold at world market prices, more farmers could profit by
growing cashews. However, since all the processing plants are in urban areas, removing
the tariff would seriously hamper the government’s effort to reduce urban unemployment
over the next five years.
Which of the following, if true, most seriously weakens the argument?
A. Some of the by-products of processing cashews are used for manufacturing paints
and plastics.
B. Other countries in which cashews are processed subsidize their processing plants.
C. More people in Kernland are engaged in farming cashews than in processing them.
D. Buying unprocessed cashews at lower than world market prices enables cashew
processors in Kernland to sell processed nuts at competitive prices.
E. A lack of profitable crops is driving an increasing number of small farmers in
Kernland off their land and into the cities.
请问为何选E?小弟选的是C

沙发
发表于 2005-12-11 23:01:00 | 只看该作者

在C和E之间有疑问,哪位NN解释一下。

板凳
 楼主| 发表于 2005-12-13 00:15:00 | 只看该作者
请NN指点。万分感激
地板
发表于 2005-12-13 00:22:00 | 只看该作者
C和E比起来,楼主难道没有觉得前者犹如隔靴搔痒吗?
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-12-14 23:27:00 | 只看该作者
还不是很明白,请NN们祥解一下,谢过。
6#
 楼主| 发表于 2005-12-14 23:34:00 | 只看该作者
E我当初没选觉得有点strenghthen的味道在里面,因为题目说废除税率将会使得降低失业率的努力付诸东流,而E说更多的农民将会涌向城市,这样人更加多,就业更加难不是加强结论么?
7#
发表于 2006-6-23 01:59:00 | 只看该作者
同问
顶顶顶!
8#
发表于 2006-6-23 04:19:00 | 只看该作者

E is correct b/c it says that: if the tariff is not lifted, the farmers will not make any money because they still have to pay for the tariff. As a result, the farmer will give up farming and will go to look for jobs in the city area.  The city's unemployment rate will go even higher in the future.

The original argument worries that by lifting the tariff, unemployment rate will go higher, but E says that either case you are not going to reduce the unemployment rate. However, if you don't lift it right now, the unemployment rate will be even worse.

9#
发表于 2007-6-24 15:06:00 | 只看该作者

C似乎就算對 也是對UMEMPLOYMENT的解釋不大 不直接

E的話 因為缺乏利潤驅使很多人在進入市區 而這些人是off thier land 的無工作者

更增加了城市的失業率 應該是這樣~~

10#
发表于 2007-6-24 16:01:00 | 只看该作者

C显然不对,这是一个非常弱的argue,E上面的朋友已经解释,实际上是利用假设反推出weaken的结论的。

还是E好,而且,我觉得做过很多类似的题,都有类似C这样不痛不嚷的选项!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-7-5 18:26
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部