ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: Ysandre
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day21

[复制链接]
41#
发表于 2022-10-10 19:31:50 | 只看该作者

10.10
1.P: 自从广告投放,对应的药品销量显著增加
C: 是这些广告导致了人们主动要求医生来开这些药
答案方向: 加强
人们来开药时候会直接指定开这种药
类似题目:
P1:只有医生可以合法,一些人支持放开处方药的广告
P2:因为医生有最终决定权对于是否给病人开处方
C:不合理的处方不会更普遍
答案方向:evaluate
a.医生的判断是否是合理的、没有利益关系的,得到的广告信息是否健康
B.医生得到的处方信息是否和病人一样
选C 错了,选E

2.D
3.C 削弱的作用
42#
发表于 2022-10-10 20:17:06 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
43#
发表于 2022-10-10 20:47:10 | 只看该作者
1.        相关因果
三年前美国政府准许了perception meditation的广告投放,然后发现三年过去大量投放广告的药品销量增加。 结论是这些广告导致了人们主动要求医生来开这些药。 问加强。
它因:药真的有用
中间因素:广告导致的xx因素导致了开药?
相反:打广告开药反而少了
因果倒置:开药多所以打广告?

It is illegal to advertise prescription medications in Hedland except directly to physicians, either by mail or in medical journals.  A proposed law would allow general advertising of prescription medications.  Opponents object that the general population lacks the specialized knowledge to evaluate such advertisements and might ask their physicians for inappropriate medications.  But since physicians have the final say as to whether to prescribe a medication for a patient, inappropriate prescriptions would not become more common.
Which of the following would it be most useful to establish in order to evaluate the argument?
(A) Whether advertising for prescription medications might alert patients to the existence of effective treatments for minor ailments that they had previously thought to be untreatable
(B) Whether some people might go to a physician for no reason other than to ask for a particular medication they have seen advertised
(C) Whether the proposed law requires prescription-medication advertisements directed to the general public to provide the same information as do advertisements directed to physicians
(D) Whether advertisements for prescription medications are currently an important source of information about newly available medications for physicians
(E) Whether physicians would give in to a patient's demand for a prescription medication chosen by the patient when the one originally prescribed by the physician fails to perform as desired

P:药打广告不好,会误导没有相关知识的患者
C:医生开处方,他们不会乱开患者要的不合适药
CQ:医生真的不会给患者开不合适的药吗?
选E,医生开的药未达预期,患者可能不相信医生坚持自己的判断,从而要给患者开的药让步


2.        D
Environmental organizations want to preserve the land surrounding the Wilgrinn Wilderness Area from residential development. They plan to do this by purchasing that land from the farmers who own it.  That plan is ill-conceived:  if the farmers did sell their land, they would sell it to the highest bidder, and developers would outbid any other bidders.  On the other hand, these farmers will never actually sell any of the land, provided that farming it remains viable. But farming will not remain viable if the farms are left unmodernized, and most of the farmers lack the financial resources modernization requires.  And that is exactly why a more sensible preservation strategy would be to assist the farmers to modernize their farms to the extent needed to maintain viability.
In the argument as a whole, the two boldface proportions play which of the following roles?
A. The first presents a goal that the argument rejects as ill-conceived; the second is evidence that is presented as grounds for that rejection.
B. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes cannot be attained; the second is a reason offered in support of that conclusion.
C. The first presents a goal that the argument concludes can be attained; the second is a judgment disputing that conclusion.
D. The first presents a goal, strategies for achieving which are being evaluated in the argument; the second is a judgment providing a basis for the argument’s advocacy of a particular strategy.
E. The first presents a goal that the argument endorses; the second presents a situation that the argument contends must be changed if that goal is to be met in the foreseeable future.
goal:保护土地
plan 1:买地
驳斥plan1:开放商出价更高
plan 2:农民留着种地,但种地没钱搞现代化,所以要帮助他们搞现代化
所以goal可能可行,但plan1思虑不周

A:不对,不行的是plan
B:前半段不对,goal可能可以达到
C:后半段不对,不是dispute,而是解决方案
D:提出目标,目标相关的策略在被评估;一个特殊策略充分性的评判基础。√
E:后半段不对,不是要改而是要支持

3.        boldface的作用是解释饮料没用的原因
One of the limiting factors in human physical performance is the amount of oxygen that is absorbed by the muscles from the bloodstream. Accordingly, entrepreneurs have begun selling at gymnasium and health club bottles of drinking water, labeled ‘super OXY’, that has extra oxygen dissolved in the water, such water would be useless in improving physical performance. However, since the amount of oxygen in the blood of someone who is exercising is already more than the muscle cell can absorb.
which of the following,if true,would serve the same function in the grammar as the statement in boldface?
A. word-class athletes turn in record performances without such water
B. frequent physical exercise increases the body’s ability to take in and use oxygen
C. the only way to get oxygen into the blood steam so that it can be absorbed by the muscles is through the lungs
D. lack of oxygen is not the only factor limiting human physical performance
E. the water lost in exercising can be replaced with ordinary tap water.

A:无关
B:无关
C:原因
D:无关
E:无关
44#
发表于 2022-10-10 21:14:06 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
45#
发表于 2022-10-10 21:24:54 | 只看该作者
同意!               
46#
发表于 2022-10-10 21:40:35 | 只看该作者
1. 新药广告
P:处方药过去不合法现在合法了
Opponents:缺乏专业知识的患者,要求医生开这些处方药
Con:医生有最终决定权,所以不合理的处方不会更常见
问评估
争论的焦点在于,医生是否会顺从患者的意见
所以选E:当原来药效不好时,医生是否会让步于患者
2. 收购农业土地
黑体题,找结论
结论:这个方法不好,我的方法好
黑体一:是目标(wants to),作者认为自己的方法才能达到这个目标
黑体二:是判断(will…),是第一个方法不好的原因之一
选D
3.原题
段落结构:背景+结论+原因(黑体)
选能够支撑结论的选项——C
47#
发表于 2022-10-10 21:44:58 | 只看该作者
12
48#
发表于 2022-10-10 21:45:55 | 只看该作者
1.政府准許藥品廣告投放,藥品銷量增加,所以是病人要求醫生開藥,加強
>>醫生沒有醫德病人說要吃什麼藥就給開

類似題:E

2.D

3.weaken:C
49#
发表于 2022-10-10 22:23:16 | 只看该作者
逻辑day21

1.新药广告投放与销量
P:过去三年大量投放广告的药品销量增加
C:广告导致人们主要要求医生来开这些药
分析:这是一个原因推理,加强可以采用排除他因,或者加强两者之间的逻辑关系
加强:(1)除了广告之外,这些药和其他同类型的药没有效果上的差别(2)很多病人不知道药的好坏,更多根据曝光度去选药

类似题目:E
Gap在于,医生有最终解释权,但病人会不会听医生的话。
2.D
3.某prep原题
分析:黑体部分是一个削弱水有用的论点
P:水里有oxy
C:喝下水就能帮助肌肉从血管中获取更多氧气
Gap:喝下的水能达到血管中么?能被肌肉吸收么?
50#
发表于 2022-10-10 23:06:13 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2025-4-23 15:14
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2025 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部