[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day17

justforstar

1.晒灯达不到想要的效果
人体有免疫可以抵御太阳里不良物质的影响

2.
没有消费者
物以稀为贵，那里太多了，大家都不需要

3.铅含量低的地方的水管的制作材料里没有这么多铅
那个地方有什么独特的饮食习惯或生活方式恰好可以消化或排出或抵御铅
检测方法不一样

700啊700

晒灯的危害更大；晒太阳有晒灯无法比拟的优势

顾客少

A

你板凳倒了

同意！               

你板凳倒了

Day 17
1.        晒皮肤
劝人们要晒皮肤的话去晒灯不要直接晒太阳，因为晒灯里大部分是UVA，太阳里面还有很多UVB,UVC,那些对人体有害的，问怎么削弱。
【分析】UVA也有害？大概。答案是晒太阳不是那么不好，UVB/C可以被吸收



2.        乡下的小鱼场
大致是说乡下小店么离渔场又近，进价又便宜，生意上的开销和城里大店一样，但是生意依然不好，问为啥啊。
【分析】太远了呗。人们的路费高之类的，销量少。看完答案还有一种方向就是价格低，比如卖鱼的多，竞争激烈


3.        Lead 会不会生病
说原来铅中毒的人很多，因为原来的水管都是铅(lead)做的。水里面含了铅，人喝了就中毒了。但是后来有人发现有些地方的人的血液里的铅含量很少。问哪一个可以解释这个问题。
认为是下面这个题：
Reviewer: The author of a recent book argues that lead contributed to many public health problems in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. He claims that the main sources of this pollutant were urban water-delivery systems, which used lead pipes that leached lead into the water supply. But my own research on municipalities that used lead pipes during the period in question has shown that the inhabitants of several of them did not exhibit symptoms of lead poisoning, so the pipes are most likely not the primary culprit.
Which of the following would, if true, most weaken the reviewer's reasoning?
(A) In certain areas, exposure to hard water--water with a high mineral content--promotes the formation of a protective coating on the interior of lead pipes.
(B) In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, many household fixtures and consumer products contained lead.
(C) Lead was introduced into gasoline in the 1920s, during which time lead-poisoning symptoms increased in many locales.
(D) Several cities that used lead pipes exhibited unusual rates of convulsive disorders and other conditions associated with lead exposure.
(E) The author in question notes that other factors, including inadequate sewer systems and urban crowding; caused widespread outbreaks of infectious diseases.
【分析】A。CR200的

花花嘛嘛

看一下！               

花花嘛嘛

Day 17
1.        晒皮肤
劝人们要晒皮肤的话去晒灯不要直接晒太阳，因为晒灯里大部分是UVA，太阳里面还有很多UVB,UVC,那些对人体有害的，问怎么削弱。
P：晒灯里大部分是UVA，太阳里面还有很多UVB,UVC,那些对人体有害的
C：晒皮肤的话去晒灯不要直接晒太阳
Gap：大部分UVA=无害？UVB/UVC=有害？
削弱：人体需要一定量的UVB, UVC，过量才会对人体有害？
            晒灯无法提供人体所需的额外元素？

2.        乡下的小鱼场
大致是说乡下小店么离渔场又近，进价又便宜，生意上的开销和城里大店一样，但是生意依然不好，问为啥啊。
P：乡下小店离渔场近，且进价便宜，营业成本一样
C：生意不好
Gap：生意好=收入-成本=单价*销售量-营业成本
解释：销售量很少，因为离住宅区太远，消费者不方便来采购

3.        Lead 会不会生病
说原来铅中毒的人很多，因为原来的水管都是铅(lead)做的。水里面含了铅，人喝了就中毒了。但是后来有人发现有些地方的人的血液里的铅含量很少。问哪一个可以解释这个问题。
认为是下面这个题：
Reviewer: The author of a recent book argues that lead contributed to many public health problems in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries. He claims that the main sources of this pollutant were urban water-delivery systems, which used lead pipes that leached lead into the water supply. But my own research on municipalities that used lead pipes during the period in question has shown that the inhabitants of several of them did not exhibit symptoms of lead poisoning, so the pipes are most likely not the primary culprit.
Which of the following would, if true, most weaken the reviewer's reasoning?
(A) In certain areas, exposure to hard water--water with a high mineral content--promotes the formation of a protective coating on the interior of lead pipes.
(B) In the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries, many household fixtures and consumer products contained lead.
(C) Lead was introduced into gasoline in the 1920s, during which time lead-poisoning symptoms increased in many locales.
(D) Several cities that used lead pipes exhibited unusual rates of convulsive disorders and other conditions associated with lead exposure.
(E) The author in question notes that other factors, including inadequate sewer systems and urban crowding; caused widespread outbreaks of infectious diseases.

bryyyyyi

看一下！               

shirleyliu_46

看一下！               

shirleyliu_46

1.        晒灯的伤害比晒太阳的伤害更大，例如晒灯里也有其他对人体有害的；或者太阳里还有其他对人体有益的；或者太阳里对人体有害的那些剂量很小没有影响；或者UVA也对人有害
2.        因为乡下的客流少
3.        A

Tiffnini

Mark一下！