[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day3

Shell_liang

看一下！               

一只小白

顶

Shell_liang

1.        水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

水泥房子-cost saving多
cooling/heating因素 在现实中会更加剧

2.        办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

信用卡有学生信息-贼实用就能辨认
前提是贼要用，但是很多贼可以不用这个卡，比如借别人的用

3.        广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

sign减少旅游业收入-ban-旅游收入仍然减少
sign有一些其他的功能，促进旅游业的增长的

一只小白

1.实验环境与真实环境一样。除了以上两个成本外，其他成本也比较低

2.贼可以易容。食堂阿姨脸盲或者看的不够仔细辨认不出来。照片不清晰没法辨认。
3.b

Pc700

同意！               

dyf冲！！！

7. 水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

p1：相比木房子，水泥房子能在cooling/heating方面省下更多的钱
p2:  实验证明了这一点
c： 相比于实验的证明，现实生活中能省下来更多
思路：水泥房子在现实生活中有一些方面比木头房子更便宜——点明现实生活和实验的不同点

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
8. 办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

p：之前现金买房，有贼，换成了信用卡，有签名和头像来减少贼
目的：减少这贼
c：措施没起效果
猜测原因：贼偷信用卡，签名和头像没防住，可能是食堂的员工不会核对人和卡
猜测原因2: 食堂没有强制使用信用卡，还是有贼用现金刷

----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
9. 广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

p：不友好的公告牌和商业标识——抑制旅游业
奇怪现象：某2个州禁止了这些公告牌和广告标识，结果旅游业发展减缓了，为啥？
推测：他因干扰，选b

Chuu_Ack

看一下！               

Chuu_Ack

922
1、
P1:水泥房子比木头房子在制热制冷方面更省钱
P2:实验证明
C:现实生活比实验省的更多
GAP:比较现实生活和实验的条件差异
猜测：雨水等自然条件使得水泥的比热更大了？

2、
P1:学生之前用现金买饭
P2:信用卡有学生签名头像，员工可以辨认学生
C:不会奏效
GAP:员工是否关心签名头像？
猜测：员工很忙，压根不看信用卡上的头像

3、
P1:不友好的广告会减少游客的增加，政府应该禁止
但是：两个禁止了不友好广告的州游客数量仍然减少了
GAP:他因？
猜测：这两个州在禁止广告的同时出台了政策，使得旅游成本变高

邦德王

1. 水泥木头房子

The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

加强（cement-cost）：1. 现实中有更多实验中没考虑到但会增加cost的问题。2. 实际环境比实验室更恶劣结果比实验室更严重、更多cost。

2. 办信用卡防贼

学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

削弱（信用卡-减少贼）：1. 贼有其他方式利用信用卡来犯罪；2. 食堂员工不会仔细辨认，贼还是有可趁之机；3. 信用卡的坏处：体积小更容易偷走。

3. 广告牌

Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?

A: Did not consider effects from other signs

B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

削弱（ban-increase）1. 其他原因影响reduction，选项B 2. 本身有很多tourism被ban掉的sign吸引

wannatechan

Mark一下！