ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: Ysandre
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day3

  [复制链接]
11#
发表于 2022-9-22 10:44:28 发自手机 Web 版 | 只看该作者


day3
1.        水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

P:实验中,cement houses 在c/h方面可以generate more cost savings 比起wood的
C:现实生活中,cement houses generate得比实验中更多

思路:范围差
加强:现实中在除了c/h之外有更多generate cost savings的方面。

2.        办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭,学校准备推出信用卡来防贼,这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像,所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来,减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

方案:使用有学生签名和头像的信用卡来代替现金

目的:减少贼

will not work:1.员工脸盲

3.        广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较(不友好)的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

环境学家:ban俩东西可以促进旅游业
two states的情况:ban俩东西旅游业更垮了

why:什么东西在two states会让ban之后旅游业更垮
A无关
B 中间因素
12#
发表于 2022-9-22 10:49:28 | 只看该作者
1.        水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
- real life中和实验的区别,关于cost savings

2.        办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭,学校准备推出信用卡来防贼,这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像,所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来,减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
--没有规定员工一定要比对脸,所以员工减少工作量就只用让学生刷卡

3.        广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较(不友好)的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
B
13#
发表于 2022-9-22 10:51:05 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
14#
发表于 2022-9-22 10:52:27 发自 iPad 设备 | 只看该作者
Mark一下!               
15#
发表于 2022-9-22 10:53:52 | 只看该作者
Day3
1.       水泥木头房子
The question saidthat there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more costsavings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conductedexperiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in reallife compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
可能有很多方向,比如科学证明水泥对于隔热要比木头强。

2.       办信用卡防贼

学生之前往往用现金买饭,学校准备推出信用卡来防贼,这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像,所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来,减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
有很多可能:
a.    家长不喜欢用信用卡,因为要还钱,学生每天的现金数量有限好控制,但信用卡无法控制
b.    食堂员工无法完全核实签名和头像
c.     一旦被偷走,会损失比先进多的财产
d.    贼的数量和是否用现金或者其他支付手段无关

3.       广告牌

Environmentalistsay that 比较(不友好)的billboardsand commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government shouldban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whosegovernment banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explainwhy?

A: Did not considereffects from other signs
B: Did not considerfactors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
a.   之前比较不友好的sign可能本身就是吸引人的一个亮点,别人觉得好玩才来
b.   这些sign虽然不友好,但是能提供很多价值,ban了之后其他人就不愿意来了
16#
发表于 2022-9-22 11:02:27 | 只看该作者
1.水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

-实验环境对水泥房子的表现不利
-实验中,能影响cost saving的因素不能像现实中那样全部仿真,使得水泥在现实表现大于实验表现

2.办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭,学校准备推出信用卡来防贼,这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像,所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来,减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

-打饭阿姨追求效率,接过来卡直接刷,根本不看卡面
-即使辨认出来,也可以说是帮舍友打饭,没法证实
-信用卡可取现,那么贼依然愿意偷

3.广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较(不友好)的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

-A 如果原题是,存在比较(不友好)与比较(友好)的两种signs,结果政府ban掉了两种在内的全部signs,那A Did not consider effects from other signs (比较友好的signs) 可能对,比较友好的积极影响大于不友好的消极影响
-B 样本一多或许能找到几个与原假设相悖的例子,可能并不是假设的逻辑错误,而是无法控制全部因素,使得他因发挥作用
17#
发表于 2022-9-22 11:06:41 发自 iPad 设备 | 只看该作者
1.        水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

类比,找实验室和生活除了cooling和heating能节省的费用
生活中水泥房子比木房子更结实,省了修理费

2.        办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭,学校准备推出信用卡来防贼,这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像,所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来,减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

食堂员工不能辨认出所有学生
丢卡比丢现金损失更大

3.        广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较(不友好)的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs扩大范围了
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
B对的
18#
发表于 2022-9-22 11:09:25 | 只看该作者
看一下!               
19#
发表于 2022-9-22 11:14:29 | 只看该作者
1.        水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
加强方向:现实社会使用水泥房子确实更省钱。答案方向:强调实验和现实生活有哪点不一样,实验忽视了哪点,而现实生活中因为有这点导致实际上水泥房子在制冷和制热上更省钱。

2.        办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭,学校准备推出信用卡来防贼,这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像,所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来,减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
由于食堂人多,食堂员工经常不仔细/没时间核对学生的签名和头像。

3.        广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较(不友好)的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?         B
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
20#
发表于 2022-9-22 11:28:50 发自 iPhone | 只看该作者
1. experiment相比real life限制了水泥优势的发挥

2.贼不是本校学生?
食堂阿姨因为人太多根本不核对人脸姓名,否则效率过于低下

3.
B:非相关因果?
+猎奇心态,越不咋地的广告牌反而更吸引人(比如椰树椰
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-22 10:05
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部