[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day3

Sharonnnhai

1. 类比推理 加强： real life 中有其他与 实验不一样的因素，影响cost savings
2. 因果推理， 因为：信用卡会有学生的签名和头像  果：所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。  削弱： 1）学生容貌发生改变，与信用卡上的头像不一样。2）刷卡时，食堂员工看不到学生。
3. 因：不好的sign will reduce the increase of tourism. 果 V M地ban 了之后能能加 tourism  削弱： B

xxxx44

1. 现实生活中木头房子条件比实验用的条件恶劣，气密性更差，
2. 食堂员工不核验身份，信用卡也可以在校外用，头像签名可以造假手段修改，盗卡人合理理由但没有规定专人专卡
3. 友好的广告牌又不是决定旅游增长的而唯一决定因素，有其他影响，比如其他广告牌的影响，季节经济社会新闻etc，甚至不友好的广告牌激发大众逆反心理也未可知

CCCandice

Day 3
1.        水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
在实际生活中，温度变化差异更大，水泥房子省更多钱
2.        办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
学生往往会在信用卡的外面带上包装，平时看不到头像
3.        广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why? 没有考虑到ban带来的更不好的结果，ban带来的负面效果比billboard自身的负面效果更大。
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

SarangZ

1.        水泥木头房子
P：Cement --more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating --wood houses.
Conducted experiment and confirmed.
C：cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment.
strengthen---实验和生活不同之处，eg制造热等需要cost
2.   办信用卡防贼
BG:学生之前用现金买饭
P:学校推出信用卡来防贼(有学生的签名和头像)&食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来
C:减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
--辨认不出学生/根本不看照片签名/仍然有用现金
3.        广告牌
p: 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. government should ban those billboards and signs.
C:But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
B

ANITAymlau

Day 3
1.        水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
现实中环境温度变化更大，更放大了水泥保温的省钱作用
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
2.        办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

食堂员工没用时间看
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
3.        广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth -->影响旅游增长的因素很多

Yangxinxin1219

打卡

Zach760！

day3:
水泥木头房子
p: 实验证明cement houses相比于wood houses在AC制冷/加热上cost更低； C: cost saving在现实中可能更多；
加强题： 因为conclusion是强调了会更多，所以推测答案会提出别的没有提到的cost saving的因素，总之是强调p和c关系的相关性

办信用卡防贼
P1: 学生过去用现金； P2: 推出带有学生头像和签名的信用卡
c: 盗窃会变少
削弱题： 推测结果为他因选项；或者同因反果 （其他学校也这么干，但是效果不佳）

广告牌
P1: 不友好广告牌会减少游客；
P2: 两个省份ban了这类sign却依然还是出现了游客量减少
解释题： 他因归因

Yangxinxin1219

Day 3
1.        水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
可能答案：现实中水泥房子还需要很高的运输费用
2.        办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
可能答案：信用卡的头像很模糊或者阿姨根本不会仔细看
3.        广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
B

Dlunlun

1. 水泥木头房子：水泥有在cooling/heating方面省钱的优势，结论是真实情况下水泥更省钱。要加强的话，我们可以说明水泥不仅在cooling/heating上省钱，还在其他方面省钱，比如运输费

2. 办信用卡防贼：遇到学生用不是本人信用卡的情况，食堂的员工也无法查证

3. B

petittomato

Day 3
1.        水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
①experiment和real life有什么不同，比如real life的极端天气更多之类
②参加experiment的cement和wood和real life里的不太一样？比如real life里的质量会更好一点

2.        办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
①贼一般在食堂很忙的时候出现，这时候员工也很忙，没时间辨认学生

3.        广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
A