[揽瓜阁逻辑小分队] day3

svdw

1.P：水泥房比木头房子更省钱
C：现实生活中比实验中省得更多
Gap：现实生活中cooling/heating变化大，水泥散热慢，省电
2.P：学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。
C：方法不会奏效
Gap：贼会打扮成学生的样子买饭；信用卡可以换成钱且不需要本人操作；食堂阿姨根本看不过来
3.P：Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
Gap：有可能是其他因素导致了旅游业下降

小卡lethe

【DAY 3】
1水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
【逻辑链】 cement→real time cost savings↑
【答案方向】①real life中实际cement的用量更多；②real life中cooling/heating的情况更极端；③cement与现实中更多物质结合会有更大的cost saving效果
2办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
【逻辑链】信用卡有身份验证→防贼↓
【答案方向】①学生依然选择现金而非信用卡；②学生中存在互相借卡等行为
3广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
【逻辑链】无signs→tourism↓
【答案方向】①在这两个states这种signs是很多游客去打卡的旅游特色；②signs被ban的损失使得商家对于旅游及相关产品全面加价

顾周i

Day 3
1.        水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
P：实验证明：水泥房子比木头房子在制冷制热上更省钱
C：实际情况比实验情况更省钱【实验情况缩小了误差】
加强：实验对象不具备代表性、【猜测：用水泥房子的极小值和木头房子的极大值相比了——比实际情况中的差距小】

2.        办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
解释补gaps：
措施：推出信用卡
目的：防贼
【措施未达成目的】
从措施的可行性和可接受性出发
要么是推行信用卡会有什么问题（即方案不可行）
要么是推行信用卡但是学生不轻易改变消费习惯（方案的接受性）

3.        广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
解释补gaps
【Environmentalist】
P：广告标识减少游客增长（注意是增长）C：政府禁止这些广告标识
?
有俩州禁止了这个广告，但是游客数量减少了
C：说明广告标识和游客量无关/或说Environmentalist的观点是错误的
他因导致游客数量下降 ——B

Rhythmicic

如图如图啊啊啊

nononohhh

今日份打卡

Cocoboyxx

1.水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

F：有水泥和木头两种材料的房屋
P：相较于木头房，水泥房更有可能在降温和保暖方面节省更多的钱
C：与实验相比，节省的钱会更多
Q：问加强
思路：关联实验环境和真实环境差别与省钱
方向：实验环境会为了一些极端情况的实验结果而设置较为极端的温度；真实环境中，房间内会为了保暖和降温采取其他措施，这种措施与房间的材料产生协同效应，能更省钱

2.办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?

F：学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼
P：这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼
C：这种措施并不奏效
Q：问解释
思路：方案可行性；方案的否定性副作用；冲突目标；方案的可接受性(❌此处不考虑)
方向：食堂员工平时根本无时间辨认学生；贼也可以伪造信用卡

3.广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

F：环境保护者说比较不友好的广告牌和标语会减少旅游的增长政府应该禁这些广告牌和标语
P：？
C：但政府禁了广告牌和标语的两个州经历了旅游负增长
Q：问解释
思路：它因
方向：A，other signs不一定与旅游有关；B，未考虑其他因素，正确；

Miya422

1.        水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.

逻辑链：实验证明水泥房子的cooling/heating的cost saving很多------所以现实产生的cost saving会更多
问加强：现实比实验可能会增加的地方，比如cost saving和面积相关，现实的房子往往比实验的面子大

2.        办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
逻辑链：信用卡有签名和头像-----员工可以辨别学生------防贼
问削弱：1. 由于一些原因（学生太多，学生长身体呢，和头像不像），员工无法辨认是不是本人 （无法实现）
             2. 由于打饭高峰，员工很忙，根本不会仔细辨认头像和本人（无法实施）

3.        广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
逻辑链：环境学家说不好的billboards and commercial signs会减少旅游增长，所以应该取消-----但是有两个已经取消的州，旅游增长还是降低了。
问原因：1. 忽视了旅游增长降低还有其他主要原因
             2. 不好的billboards and commercial signs会减少旅游增长，但是这两个州错误判断好不好的

旺旺碎冰冰

【DAY 3】
1水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.
加强：现实生活中实际cement的用量更多；实验使用的房屋大小或者其他一些因素变量无法与现实中保持一致，不具有参考性

2办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
原因：人很多的时候食堂员工并不会注意信用卡上的照片是不是本人

3广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth

原因：也许旅游下降还有别的原因（b）

Miranda0707

1.        水泥木头房子
The question said that there are two houses: cement水泥 and wood. Cement houses are likely to generate more cost savings in terms of cooling/heating compared to wood houses. Conducted experiment and confirmed. Argument says that cost savings will be more in real life compared to the experiment. Ask to strengthen.——除了制冷制热，水泥房子还有持久性的特点，也可以省钱
2.        办信用卡防贼
学生之前往往用现金买饭，学校准备推出信用卡来防贼，这种信用卡会有学生的签名和头像，所以食堂里的员工可以辨认出学生来，减少贼。But this measure will not work, why?
——员工不会有太多时间精力确认持卡人和照片一致
3.        广告牌
Environmentalist say that 比较（不友好）的billboards and commercial signs will reduce the increase of tourism. So government should ban those billboards and signs. But two states – vemon and maine -- whose government banned the sign experienced a reduction in tourism growth. Explain why?
A: Did not consider effects from other signs
B: Did not consider factors other than the bans that may affect the tourism growth
——The reduction in tourism growth in the states of Vemon and Maine after the ban on billboards and commercial signs does not necessarily indicate a direct cause-and-effect relationship between the bans and the decline in tourism. It is important to consider other factors that could have influenced the tourism growth in those states.

Turv_vc

1.        对于这种增强应该对比两种房子的其他特点，用他因增强。
可以说在现实生活中，大风大雨可能会导致木头房子的损坏比水泥房子的损害更大，因为前者比较脆弱。
2.        学生使用信用卡需要现金存钱，所以贼还是有机可乘
3.        答案选择B