ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: dublue
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[梦之队日记] dublue的gmat打卡日记

[复制链接]
11#
发表于 2020-4-10 16:30:11 | 只看该作者

写得很好,以后每天看!
12#
 楼主| 发表于 2020-4-10 19:36:22 | 只看该作者
读你 发表于 2020-4-10 16:30
写得很好,以后每天看!

谢谢!一起加油!
13#
 楼主| 发表于 2020-4-10 21:54:34 | 只看该作者
4-11

SC20题☑️
20题千行分析☑️
曼哈顿脑图6-7
NS小分队☑️
百词斩100☑️
===============================
昨天看见一个NN写的帖子,里面的一段话也印证了之前分析OG的想法:
以下划重点#
1.这道题的最佳切入点是什么?我的切入点与最优解法是否一致?
如果一致,我是通过什么定位到这个点,这种考点有什么特征——由个体推到整体,我们要通过练习得到一个“通解”。
如果不一致,我的定位点是什么,这个定位正确吗?如果正确可行,那可以沿用自己的方法,毕竟适合自己的才是最好的。如果不可行,那我为什么会认为这个是错的?是不是语法掌握出了问题?——这一步尤为关键,因为导致你实战分数低的原因,可能就是这些你坚信不疑,其实却是错误的排除切入点。
2.分析完各个选项,总结这道题的考点都是什么,例如:which/doing/to do三种修饰的区分;逻辑主语;谓语动词单复数。。。总结出考点,再回头看看这道题~唔,原来这道题想考这些点,我一开始只想到哪里,我的眼光只局限在哪里,下次要关注那些地方~~”

三战670-650-730 希望对也曾因成绩退步而想放弃的考友有鼓励和启发https://forum.chasedream.com/for ... 658&fromuid=1442115(出处: https://forum.chasedream.com/)

今天做题时比较冷静,试图先读懂题再找错误,比前几天正确率都上升了一点(虽然真的就是一点点),还是小开心。接下来按照这个方法分析OG。
14#
 楼主| 发表于 2020-4-11 19:27:49 | 只看该作者
OG876题我想了很一会,放在这里做个记录:
Yellow jackets number among the 900 or so species of the world's social wasps, wasps living in a highly cooperative and organized society where they consist almost entirely of females-the queen and her sterile female workers.

Awasps living in a highly cooperative and organized society where they consist almost entirely of
Bwasps that live in a highly cooperative and organized society consisting almost entirely of
Cwhich means they live in a highly cooperative and organized society, almost all 分析该选项
Dwhich means that their society is highly cooperative, organized, and it is almost entirely
Eliving in a society that is highly cooperative, organized, and it consists of almost all

答案是B,OG说平行推出来的我能理解,但是没明白为什么前面还跟了一个wasps,难道不是上一个句子最后有wasps了吗?

曼哈顿论坛上ron给出了以下答案:
your analysis of choice a is 100% correct. choice b features a rather strange-looking usage of a very common construction: the use of an appositive phrase (a noun phrase with no introductory words) to define a term, in this case 'social wasps'.
here's an example:
seamen distinguish flotsam, goods floating on seawater after a shipwreck from jetsam, goods thrown overboard by the crew of a ship.
you've probably seen this construction many times. it's weird-looking in this problem, though, because of the apparent repetition of 'wasps'.
but here's the story: the term being defined is 'social wasps'.
therefore, there's actually no redundancy: you need to think about 'wasps' and 'social wasps' as two completely different words. once you think about it that way, the sentence is just like the flotsam/jetsam example above, which should be noncontroversial.
(https://www.manhattanprep.com/gmat/forums/yellow-jackets-number-among-the-900-or-so-species-of-the-t3105.html)

补充一下appositive phrase的意思:
An appositive phrase is a noun phrase that identifies or renames another noun phrase directly before or after it. For example, you might say, “I’m going to see my dentist, Dr. Parkins.” In this case, “Dr. Parkins” is an appositive phrase because the name identifies exactly who the dentist is. The two phrases are said to be “in apposition,” and the one that does the renaming or identifying is called the appositive phrase.
The definition of appositive is such that an appositive phrase can come anywhere in a sentence, at the beginning, middle, or end. You can see this in the following example (appositives in bold):
  • The fastest man ever timed, Usain Bolt is competing in Rio this summer.
  • Usain Bolt, the fastest man in the world, is competing in the Brazil Olympics.
  • Olympic spectators are looking forward to watching Usain Bolt, the Jamaican sprinter.

=========================
另外ron神还在下面说了一个经验,觉得说的很有道理:永远不要质疑OG的正确答案!这也是分析OG的一个重要的点!
DO NOT, EVER, UNDER ANY CIRCUMSTANCES, QUESTION THE CORRECTNESS OF AN OFFICIAL ANSWER TO AN OFFICIAL PROBLEM.
the official answers are always correct -- even in cases when we moderators find them ugly and repulsive.
if something is in an official answer, it's correct. end of story. period.
so:
THE WRONG QUESTION TO ASK:
"isn't (---thing that's in official answer---) wrong?"
you already know the answer to this question: "no, it's not wrong; it appears in the official answer."
THE RIGHT QUESTION TO ASK:
"WHY is (---thing that's in official answer---) CORRECT? HOW does that WORK?"
note the big difference between these questions. the first one is a question to which you already know the answer, and which will get you nowhere in your studies. the second, on the other hand, is a constructive question whose answer will invariably expand your SC knowledge.





15#
 楼主| 发表于 2020-4-13 10:36:32 | 只看该作者
4-13

昨天折腾了一整天终于回到了武汉。希望武汉考场能尽快复原吧。
早上打开OG最后29道题,突然发现自己应该是做到hard难度了,于是想了想又关上了。
hard难度估计大部分都是考语义和整句的construction的,感觉贸然做了有点暴敛天物。
接下来1-2周整理好曼哈顿之后,看ron的视频打好基础好了。把水平提上来再做hard的题

今天任务:
曼哈顿脑图整理☑️
Ron视频2-3个☑️
Math视频2个✖️

NS小分队阅读(不仅仅是阅读,obstacle的时候注意整理逻辑框架)✖️
百词斩100个☑️

===============================================
接下来一周准备实验一下今天自己研究出来的ron学习系统:
头天按题型分类来看3个视频➡️第二天刷这一题型的题目,继续看3个视频。
有点像上学时老师说的讲考点后布置作业,不知道效果怎么样,希望能行

我本来偷咪咪的买了机构的课程,在看ron的视频与看课程视频中犹豫(因为ron视频真的太多了…)
后来觉得自己本来就不太知道中文语法名称(如状语补语什么的),还是决定花1.5周看ron神讲。现在看了1.5倍速几集觉得决定没错,真的讲的好清楚。


16#
发表于 2020-4-13 16:29:17 | 只看该作者
一起准备呀  哈哈哈  我5月28号考
17#
 楼主| 发表于 2020-4-13 17:59:17 | 只看该作者
JennyXuhy 发表于 2020-4-13 16:29
一起准备呀  哈哈哈  我5月28号考

好呀!我计划六月中旬考 因为感觉我这边考场五月还开不了?一起加油
18#
 楼主| 发表于 2020-4-13 23:17:20 | 只看该作者
4-14

SC:
曼哈顿脑图2章☑️
prep07-10题+错题分析☑️

Math:皮毛群10题打卡+分析☑️

日常:
NS小分队一篇☑️
百词斩100个
================================
事实证明我昨天说要尝试的那个按类型刷题方法对SC行不通。我是在某分网上按他的分类刷了10道平行题,但回看错题时发现一个大问题,就是SC的题型分类是极其主观的!
比如我错的一道题,在网站上是在平行类别里,但是在我手上的千行里又被分成了sentence construction,另一个解析里又成了modifier。
造成这样的原因可能是因为1.一道题本身就有好几个考点 2.每个人看到的错误不一样,所以找出的这道题的主要考点也不一样
所以还是乖乖的回去按顺序刷0708好了?做的错题按照我自己认为的标准分类到个题型的文件夹里
等CR的时候再试试按分类做题,CR的题型分类标准应该比较固定

今天还有一个大教训,就是一开始给自己布置了太多tasks,导致后来到了下午overwhelm了...

19#
 楼主| 发表于 2020-4-14 23:27:36 | 只看该作者
4-15

prep07-10题+错题分析✔️
曼哈顿脑图over✔️
数学皮毛群10题+错题订正✔️
数学视频1-2个✖️

NS小分队一篇✔️
百词斩100✔️
20#
 楼主| 发表于 2020-4-16 01:49:41 发自手机 Web 版 | 只看该作者
4-16

SC-prep07 10题+分析☑️
CR-皮毛群13题☑️+分析(明天一起做)
math-皮毛群10题+分析☑️
ron sc视频3个☑️

百词斩✖️

==================================
今天赶着赶着把主要任务做完了,ron的视频在吃饭时看的好像还很下饭(?)
再来感叹一下ron讲的真好啊,特别是今天看到他讲and的用法和ving的区别,一下子就被理顺了。

有点后悔cr的皮毛群加早了,其实到下月中都是想好好复习SC的,导致现在每天时间都很紧
不过加都加了,顺带刷刷题目也还不错,正好可以13道CR+20道SC+1-2篇阅读作为一整套刷。

不知道为什么SC正确率还是上不去。我经常就是在迷惑选项和正确选项当中选择了迷惑选项,好想赶快打通自己的任督二脉。
偶然发现了一个还比较靠谱的prep的SC分类,还是准备按照分类做一下找一下规律好了。

明天继续加油



您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-27 01:12
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部