【悦笃】1015起悦笃寂静整理（更新至48）

awillleadaway

limo920 发表于 2016-10-21 01:26
感谢放狗～！！

应该的~！多亏阅读君的整理，我这次中了很多~！

杀伐四方

Mark一下！               

Stella_llll

阅读君~  想问一下每篇文章的标题后面的那个数字  是本次更新的新狗主人数吗？  还是别的其他意思呀  
另外感谢整理！！

miyazheng

菌菌，44那个参考文献链接打不开，直接复制一下可以么？谢谢啦~~~

章鱼xixi

感谢分享！               

icedlatte

1021北美考场来放狗，中了四篇但是v还是考成狗
1.网店实体店2.印第安那水权3.aero温室效应4.环保的优势
题目已失忆。。sooooo 骚里

orange940306

我考到了一个题  讲的是 企业之间的联盟 service alliance.
一共就两段。第一段介绍了 两种企业联盟的形式 一个是什么service alliance，一个是assert alliance。先介绍了这两个的概念。service alliance 就是大概把商品大概类似的东西在一起 还具体举了例子 例子好像是在飞机上提供某个品牌的咖啡 这个咖啡的认知度就会提高？。assert alliance 就是共享property 以减少类似于租用场地的开支。例子记不清楚了 但是特别帮助理解这个定义 类似于在便利店里卖报纸 报纸的销量也会增长？）
第二段大概就讲了这两种联盟可能会出现的弊端。service 的弊端是 大概就是会相互好的影响 也会不好的影响吧。assert 好像说两种alliance的budget要match。举反例说明就是 一个什么不怎么高档的餐厅 如果开在一个luxury hotel的话 就不match。
问题问的 有以下哪种形式符合assert alliance？或者service alliance？失忆zhong
答案有 在加油站里卖什么 fast food breakfast 忘记选哪个了。

仅供参考。。。文章不难 很容易懂。

LeonUP

真心感谢，！！！！THX

linge0815

感谢分享！               

鱼包蛋呃

第十三篇寂静我在og的verbal分册上做过差不多的，分享给大家可以看看，阅读君有空的话也可以整理进去让大家看一下，应该有改动，但是大概意思差不多，可以看看生词之类的，当初做的时候没怎么看懂
In current historiography, the picture of a consistent, unequivocal decline in
women’s status with the advent of capitalism and industrialization is giving
way to an analysis that not only emphasizes both change (whether
improvement or decline) and continuity but also accounts for geographical
and occupational variation. The history of women’s work in English
farmhouse cheese making between 1800 and 1930 is a case in point. In her
influential Women Workers and the Industrial Revolution (1930),
Pinchbeck argued that the agricultural revolution of the eighteenth and early
nineteenth centuries, with its attendant specialization and enlarged scale of
operation, curtailed women’s participation in the business of cheese
production. Earlier, she maintained, women had concerned themselves with
feeding cows, rearing calves, and even selling the cheese in local markets and
fairs. Pinchbeck thought that the advent of specialization meant that
women’s work in cheese dairying was reduced simply to processing the milk.
“Dairymen” (a new social category) raised and fed cows and sold the cheese
through factors, who were also men. With this narrowing of the scope of
work, Pinchbeck believed, women lost business ability, independence, and
initiative.
Though Pinchbeck portrayed precapitalist, preindustrial conditions as
superior to what followed, recent scholarship has seriously questioned the
notion of a golden age for women in precapitalist society. For example,
scholars note that women’s control seldom extended to the disposal of the
proceeds of their work. In the case of cheese, the rise of factors may have
compromised women’s ability to market cheese at fairs. But merely selling
the cheese did not necessarily imply access to the money: Davidoff cites the
case of an Essex man who appropriated all but a fraction of the money from
his wife’s cheese sales.
By focusing on somewhat peripheral operations, moreover, Pinchbeck
missed a substantial element of continuity in women’s participation:
throughout the period women did the central work of actually making
cheese. Their persistence in English cheese dairying contrasts with women’s
early disappearance from arable agriculture in southeast England and from
American cheese dairying. Comparing these three divergent developments
yields some reasons for the differences among them. English cheese-making
women worked in a setting in which cultural values, agricultural conditions,
and the nature of their work combined to support their continued
participation. In the other cases, one or more of these elements was lacking