【悦笃】1015起悦笃寂静整理（更新至48）

ashzhan

我考到了16，但是我觉得鸡精有点点问题，原始和考古不是同一篇，我考到的是考古的内容，讲排放的微粒可以形成云，然后mask全球变暖什么的，不长，也没什么人提出理论。

我贴一下我原始狗记得的东西，供参考：

第一篇，讲的是反全球变暖。但是跟鸡精16貌似不太一样，感觉比那个短，还比那个简单。
说全球变暖是一种大趋势，但是有些地方的气温保持了steady，甚至有下降（好像此处有题）。原因是有一种什么东西，可以通过飘在空中聚集水滴形成云，从而使气候变冷。但是这种影响在地面和在ocean是不一样的（有题，好像是问这个imply了什么，还是作用是什么。构筑选了最白痴的那个答案，说这种东西的影响在各处是不一样的，基本就是把原文换个说法重新说一遍）。为什么会变冷呢，有两种作用，一是云阻挡了阳光普照大地，一是那些云特别白，白的能反射更多阳光。这样。
然后说这种变冷现象mask了全球变暖现象。因为变暖是持续的，而变冷的话你把那些排放这种变冷颗粒的工厂关掉就不冷了。（这里也有题，问什么忘记了）

Ssuperbunny

noblegs 发表于 2016-10-18 23:56
是这篇吗？
Some historians contend that conditions in the United States during the Second World Wa ...

就是这个

seal627

楼楼，你看一下29.南极臭氧层那篇~我搜到一篇文章感觉很像，但是GMAC肯定有删改

A full recovery of the stratospheric ozone hole could modify climate change in the Southern Hemisphere and even amplify Antarctic warming, according to scientists from the University of Colorado at Boulder, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration and NASA.
While Earth's average surface temperatures have been increasing, the interior of Antarctica has exhibited a unique cooling trend during the austral summer and fall caused by ozone depletion, said Judith Perlwitz of the Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences, a joint institute of CU-Boulder and NOAA. "If the successful control of ozone-depleting substances allows for a full recovery of the ozone hole over Antarctica, we may finally see the interior of Antarctica begin to warm with the rest of the world," Perlwitz said.
Perlwitz is lead author of a new study on the subject to be published April 26 in Geophysical Research Letters. Co-authors include Steven Pawson and Eric Nielson of NASA's Goddard Space Flight Center in Greenbelt, Md., and Ryan Fogt and William Neff of NOAA's Earth System Research Laboratory in Boulder. The study was supported by NASA's Modeling and Analysis Program.
The authors used a NASA supercomputer model that included interactions between the climate and stratospheric ozone chemistry to examine how changes in the ozone hole influence climate and weather near Earth's surface, said Perlwitz.
The study authors calculated that when stratospheric ozone levels return to near pre-1969 levels by the end of the 21st century, large-scale atmospheric circulation patterns now shielding the Antarctic interior from warmer air masses to the north will begin to break down during the austral summer. The circulation patterns are collectively known as a positive phase of the Southern Annular Mode, or SAM.
The scientists found that as ozone levels recover, the lower stratosphere over the polar region will absorb more harmful ultraviolet radiation from the sun. This could cause air temperatures roughly 6 to 12 miles above Earth's surface to rise by as much as 16 degrees Fahrenheit, reducing the strong north-south temperature gradient that currently favors the positive phase of SAM, said the research team.
The supercomputer modeling effort also indicated that ozone hole recovery would weaken the intense westerly winds that currently whip around Antarctica and block air masses from crossing into the continent's interior. As a result, Antarctica would no longer be isolated from the warming patterns affecting the rest of the world.
NASA's Pawson said ozone recovery over Antarctica would essentially reverse summertime climate and atmospheric circulation changes that have been caused by the presence of the ozone hole. "It appears that ozone-induced climate change occurred quickly, over 20 to 30 years, in response to the rapid onset of the ozone hole," he said. "These seasonal changes will decay more slowly than they built up, since it takes longer to cleanse the stratosphere of ozone-depleting gases than it took for them to build up."
The seasonal shift in large-scale circulation patterns could have repercussions for Australia and South America as well. Other studies have shown that the positive phase of SAM is associated with cooler temperatures over much of Australia and increased rainfall over Australia's southeast coastline.
During late spring and early summer, the positive phase of SAM also is associated with drier conditions in South America's productive agricultural areas like Argentina, Brazil, Uruguay and Paraguay, said Perlwitz. If ozone recovery induces a shift away from a positive SAM, Australia could experience warmer and drier conditions while South America could get wetter, she said.
But just how influential a full stratospheric ozone recovery will be on Southern Hemisphere climate largely depends on the future rate of greenhouse gas emissions, according to the GRL authors. Projected increases in human-emitted greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide will be the main driver for strengthening the positive phase of SAM.
"In running our model simulations, we assumed that greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide would double over the next 40 years and then slowly level off," said Perlwitz. "If human activities cause more rapid increases in greenhouse gases, or if we continue to produce these gases for a longer period of time, then the positive SAM may dominate year-round and dwarf any climatic effects caused by ozone recovery."
NASA's High-End Computing Program provided the Columbia supercomputer resources at the NASA Ames Research Center in Moffett Field, Calif.

limo920

ashzhan 发表于 2016-10-19 10:17
我考到了16，但是我觉得鸡精有点点问题，原始和考古不是同一篇，我考到的是考古的内容，讲排放的微粒可以形 ...

你的原始是三段吗？

limo920

eyuniangniang 发表于 2016-10-18 22:47
今天晚上考了四篇~123篇在前25篇里面都有出现过
第一篇讲生物多样性的，一屏。说的是对于生态管理没有明确 ...

多谢放狗！！

limo920

小黄黄香蕉 发表于 2016-10-19 09:44
整理菌可不可以快点更新呀~晚上就要考了~催更了不好意思~

我白天要上班晚上用业余时间整理，已经保证每天一更了。而且我是时差党，你要是着急的话建议先自己整理，整理好的版本也可以考完后分享出来。：）

frank10

下午场，阅读中了三篇，分别是保险公司债券、电商vs实体店、德州墨西哥人的文化融合，题目根狗狗差不多。但是第一篇好像是寂静里面没有看到的：
第一段讲的是有些人认为某些物种灭绝是因为人类的影响或者是很多生物生活在哪个区域（？？）但是作者否定了这个观点。
第二段作者好像举了个例子，说活动范围小的物种更容易灭绝，相对于活动范围大的物种。（此处有题）
第三段还是继承第二段的观点吧，进一步论述，说应该给活动范围小的生物建立保护区之类的。
由于一上来就不是寂静的文章有点懵逼，文章大概是这个意思吧。考题有考第一段的主旨吧，第二段的细节题（哪个是true），还考了第二段的作用。
二战很失落，verbal做的很烂，比一战还差...希望下一次能够达到700+。。。先哭一会去T T。。。

ashzhan

limo920 发表于 2016-10-19 12:47
你的原始是三段吗？

感觉是两段。是在云的两种作用那里分段的。

limo920

ashzhan 发表于 2016-10-20 01:13
感觉是两段。是在云的两种作用那里分段的。

那应该跟考古文章是一样的呀？