ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

To evaluate a plan to save money on office-space expenditures by having its employees work at home, XYZCompany asked volunteers from its staff to try the arrangement for six months. During this period, theproductivity of these employees was as high as or higher than before.

Which of the following, if true, would argue most strongly against deciding, on the basis of the trial results, toimplement the company's plan?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 2302|回复: 1
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[Helr题库] 求鉴定这个分类对么?

[复制链接]
跳转到指定楼层
楼主
发表于 2016-6-14 22:59:45 | 只看该作者 回帖奖励 |倒序浏览 |阅读模式
To evaluate a plan to save money on office-space expenditures by having its employees work at home, XYZ Company asked volunteers from its staff to try the
arrangement for six months. During this period, the productivity of these employees was as high as or higher than before.

Which of the following, if true, would argue most strongly against deciding, on the basis of the trial results, to implement the company’s plan?

(A) The employees who agreed to participate in the test of the plan were among the company’s most self-motivated and independent workers.
(B) The savings that would accrue from reduced office-space expenditures alone would be sufficient to justify the arrangement for the company, apart
from any productivity increases.
(C) Other companies that have achieved successful results from work-at home plans have workforces that are substantially larger than that of XYZ.
(D) The volunteers who worked at home were able to communicate with other employees as necessary for performing the work.
(E) Minor changes in the way office work is organized at XYZ would yield increases in employee productivity similar to those achieved in the trial.

这个看起来是方案模式,但因为有对这个方案进行评估(the productivity of these employees was as high as or higher than before),所以应该是因果推理
因是:XYZ Company asked volunteers from its staff to try the arrangement for six months
果是:the productivity of these employees was as high as or higher than before

所以思路应该是把选项加在因和果之间,即看选项+因是否可以=果

A选项削弱了这个因果,因为它把这个因给局限了,所以是答案;
B选项说省出来的除了可以增加工作效率,同时也有效的证明了公司的安排,这个应该是i加强吧
C选项说另一个通过在家工作的方法获得成功的公司有更多的职员,这个无关吧;
D选项加强了因果关系,它说在家可以和别的职员沟通,也就是说在家+和职员沟通=高效,所以是加强
E选项有点不知道怎么说……

求大神指正一下~


收藏收藏 收藏收藏
沙发
发表于 2016-6-19 09:25:38 | 只看该作者
完全正确。
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-4-27 16:07
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部