ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

A product that represents a clear technological advance over competing products can generally command a high price. Because technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the greatest price the market will bear when they have such a product. But large profits on the new product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the new product's capabilities. Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.

In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?

正确答案: B

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 1707|回复: 2
打印 上一主题 下一主题

请大家看一下->>>GWD-1-3, 谢谢了!

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-5-19 15:13:00 | 只看该作者

请大家看一下->>>GWD-1-3, 谢谢了!

问一下如何理解题里的两个地方

A product that represents a clear technological advance over competing products can generally command a high price.  Because technological advances tend to be quickly surpassed and companies want to make large profits while they still can, many companies charge the greatest price the market will bear when they have such a product.  But large profits on the mew product will give competitors a strong incentive to quickly match the mew product’s capabilities.  Consequently, the strategy to maximize overall profit from a new product is to charge less than the greatest possible price.






In the argument above, the two portions in boldface play which of the following roles?







  1. The first is an assumption that forms the basis for a course of action that the argument criticizes; the second presents the course of action endorsed by the argument.


  2. The first is a consideration raised to explain the appeal of a certain strategy; the second is a consideration raised to call into question the wisdom of adopting that strategy.


  3. The first is an assumption that has been used to justify a certain strategy; the second is a consideration that is used to cast doubt on that assumption.


  4. The first is a consideration raised in support of a strategy the argument endorses; the second presents grounds in support of that consideration.


  5. The first is a consideration raised to show that adopting a certain strategy is unlikely to achieve the intended effect; the second is presented to explain the appeal of that strategy.

我想问的是文中给了两个strategy(如黄色部分所示),我该怎么区分答案说的到底针对那个strategy呢?



[此贴子已经被作者于2005-5-20 2:02:16编辑过]
沙发
发表于 2005-5-20 03:37:00 | 只看该作者

靠理解吧

板凳
发表于 2005-5-20 14:34:00 | 只看该作者
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-19 11:28
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部