- UID
- 84324
- 在线时间
- 小时
- 注册时间
- 2005-4-1
- 最后登录
- 1970-1-1
- 主题
- 帖子
- 性别
- 保密
|
英国master评价 by a web in usa
MAs and MScs are the new career must-haves, and they're not too rigorous: you
can even get one by studying Nicole Kidman, as long as you pay enough. Rachel
Aspden reports
No longer the preserve of eggheads, hyper-aesthetes or carbuncular
information scientists, Masters degrees are the new career must-have. In a
market place swamped with more fresh graduates each year, an MA, MSc or MBA
on the CV is increasingly seen as providing its holder with a vital edge.
As participation rates in higher education rise, and as ever more students
get Upper Seconds and Firsts, first-degree graduates need something else to
make them stand out. "You could say that degrees are the new A-levels and
Masters are the new degrees," says a disgruntled lecturer in humanities at
Warwick University.
For the more canny universities, these anxieties are proving highly
lucrative. While fees for undergraduates are regulated by the government,
universities are free to set fees for Masters courses themselves. UK/EU fees
average £4,000, with international students paying between £8,000
and £12,000
for the same courses. The more exclusive the course, the higher the fees - a
Masters in business administration at the London Business School costs
£41,970.
What students think they are buying is a prestigious academic brand to put on
their CV. "The name is what you pay for," says Katie Johnson, an MSc student
at the London School of Economics. The universities cautiously
agree. "Masters applicants are primarily attracted by our international
reputation," says Professor Stephen Chan, dean of law and social sciences at
London's School of Oriental and African Studies (Soas). Along with every
other UK university, Soas, says Chan, is "looking hard at how to grow our one-
year MA courses". Though he would not say so, this may entail some sharp
financial practice, as well as adroit brand management.
The LSE leads this hard-headed field. It runs the largest taught Masters
programme in the country, offering more than 90 courses to 3,116 students,
and numbers are poised to rise by another 10 per cent next year. Tuition fees
average £12,000, with few discounts for UK/EU students, a policy
sharply
defended by the LSE's spokeswoman Judith Higgins: "In our experience,
graduates can well afford the fee. Many of them go straight into highly paid
jobs after the award of their Masters."
But, struggling with accumulating debt, the students take a more jaded
view. "LSE is a Masters factory," says Abby Vietor, an American MSc student.
The more cynical students suggest that admissions policies and academic
assessment are being relaxed. "The LSE's grading system is extremely
general," says Bhanu Bhatnagar, a candidate for an MSc in media and
communications. "It's disappointing, given the amount of time and energy that
I put into producing my essays."
Stories abound of absent lecturers, overstretched facilities and teaching
foisted on to unprepared PhD students. On my own recent Masters course, I
arrived at my tutor's office two weeks running to find him dozing on the
sofa, blinds drawn and essays crumpled unread under the daily papers.
An American graduate from Columbia University says he worked for three years
to save the £11,000 fee for an MA course at another British college
which, he
hoped, would enhance his career in arts journalism. But his course turned
into an expensive catalogue of frustrations. His student visa required a
minimum of eight taught hours a week, but he found himself sharing a two-
hour, twice-weekly seminar with 19 other students. Classes ran for only 20
weeks of the year, which meant that he was paying more than £130 an
hour "to
listen to people describing papers on Nicole Kidman".
"The classes were astounding for their lack of content," he says. "Analysing
the lyrics of 'Strange Fruit' for two hours was truly embarrassing." Attempts
to discuss the course content and structure with lecturers met with evasion
or silence. Disillusioned, the student returned to New York to work for a
literary agency. His MA, he says, proved "utterly useless". Another student,
studying for an MSc at a university outside London, says: "It just isn't
taken seriously by the tutors. Some two-hour seminars last 20 to 30 minutes."
Given the hefty price tag on Masters courses, students are not impressed by
the warning from the university regulator, Ruth Deech, that postgraduates
must "expect the rough with the smooth". What some would see as picturesque
incompetence, they see as infuriating negligence. They don't want charming
eccentricity; they want professionalism and (whisper it) customer service.
They prefer lecturers who wear Gucci shirts to those with tweed jackets, and
tutors who own Blackberries to those with port decanters.
But academic staff have their grievances, too. "MA courses are the single
thing that has ratcheted up the teaching workload over the past decade," says
Dr John Mullan, senior lecturer at University College London. "MA teaching
has become a major commitment, without any compensating reduction in
undergraduate and PhD supervision. It's a juggernaut."
As Mullan suggests, universities are being forcibly awakened to the demands
of their assiduously courted Masters students. "We have to break down the
barriers between staff and students," concedes Professor Steven Parissien,
dean of arts at Plymouth University. Dr Kasia Boddy, lecturer and long-time
MA course convener at UCL, agrees: "MA students are more likely to see
themselves as consumers than any other kind of student. They feel they are
paying for a service and want to receive it."
But do Masters degrees enhance your job prospects as the universities claim?
Official statistics offer some encouragement. Six months after graduation,
nearly a quarter of UK Masters graduates were employed in management, and one-
eighth in teaching. Just 3.7 per cent were still unemployed six months after
completing their course, against 6.7 per cent of first-degree graduates.
Recruitment consultants suggest, however, that the advantages of a Masters
degree vary enormously. "It has a beneficial effect in some sectors, but in
others it may not help candidates at all," says James Pritchard, managing
director of the JPA Group of recruitment companies. Some universities may
link their course prices to increased employability but, once the fees arrive
with the registrar, they might pay little attention to their graduates'
career trajectories.
"Careers services in the UK are very weak," says Vietor. "Getting a Masters
in the US may be expensive, but universities work hard to ensure that their
students get jobs out of it."
One foreign MSc student, hoping her degree would help her find work in the
UK, visited her college careers service to find the work visa options almost
nil and the staff indifferent to her situation. "They suggested I get married
if I wanted to work here," she says.
As such grumbles grow, British universities may increasingly find that
Masters courses are no longer the easy way to plug their funding gaps.
Colleges in Australia, Canada, Europe and the Far East are fast catching on
to the lucrative market, offering excellent teaching at prices UK
institutions cannot match.
Andrew Clarke, a Cambridge University graduate, chose the University of
British Columbia in Vancouver for his MA in political science. After the
tuition scholarship awarded to most MA candidates, his fees in Canada roughly
amount to £1,500 only. "The course is excellent value for money," he
says. "Academic standards are high and the faculty is very international. I'm
pleased with my choice."
If more Masters students are not to follow Clarke abroad, UK universities
must abandon branding schmaltz and choose instead old-fashioned quality,
reliability and value for money.
|
|
[复制链接]
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2005-5-1 19:45:00
