类别:化石/遗迹 没留下 不等于 没有出现过
Prep2012-Pack1-CR-035 VCR001345 MediumPerkins: According to an article I read, the woolly mammoth‘s extinction in North Americacoincided with a migration of humansonto the continent12,000 years ago, and stone spearheads from this period indicatethat these people were hunters. But the author's contention that being hunted by humans contributed to thewoolly mammoth‘s extinction is surelywrong since, as paleontologists know, no spearheads have ever been found among the many mammothbones that have been unearthed.
Which of the following, if true, provides the strongest reason for discounting the evidencePerkins cites inarguing againstthe contention that being hunted by humans contributed to the North American extinction of woollymammoths? A. At sites where mammoth bones dating from 12,000years ago have been unearthed, bones of other mammalshave rarely been found. B. The stone from whichstone spearheads were made is unlikely to have disintegrated over the course of 12,000 years. Stone stilled integrated but notfound, strengthen C. Conditions in North America 12,000years ago were such thathumans could not have survivedthere on a diet that did not includesubstantial amounts of meat. D. Cave paintings in North Americathat date from 12,000 years ago depict woolly mammothsas well as a varietyof other animals,including deer and buffalo. E. Because of the great effort that would have been requiredto produce each stone spearhead, hunters would not have been to leave thembehind.
Mine:
P: no spearheads have ever been found among the many mammoth bones C: hunter is not responsible for the wolly extinction
Weaken=> spearheads has been taken away? hunters use spear to hunt animal? 下面引用部分的彩色部分
Reasoning
What would suggest thathunting by humans may have contributed to the mammoths' extinction, even thoughno spearheads have been found among mammoth bones? Perkins argues that since no spearheadshave been found among mammoth remains, human hunting must not have contributedto the mammoths’ extinction. Perkins's argument assumes that humans did nothunt mammoths mainly with weapons other than spears; that spearheads would beleft among remains of any mammoths killed with spears; that paleontologistshave found a fair number of mammoth remains; and that any spearheads left amongthe remains would likely stay with them and be discovered. Any statement thatcalls any of these assumptions into question would provide a reason to discountthe evidence Perkins offers.
A. If humans did not hunt mammoths, then mammothbones probably would not be found with other mammal bones around prehistoricsettlements where humans ate other mammals. Therefore, this would be compatiblewith Perkins’ argument.
B. This strengthens Perkins’ argument by out apossible alternative explanation of why paleontologists have found nospearheads in mammoth remains.
C. The prehistoric humans could have eaten meatother than mammoths, and this does not explain how they could have huntedmammoths without paleontologists finding spearheads in mammoth remains.
D. Perkins already acknowledges that humanscoexisted with mammoths in North America, and this does not explain how humanscould have hunted mammoths without paleontologists finding spearheads inmammoth remains.
E.Correct.This explains how, despite the evidence Perkins offers, humans may well havehunted mammoths without leaving any spearheads for paleontologists to discoverin mammoth remains.
Thecorrect answer is E.
Which of the following most logically completes the argument?
The last members of a now-extinct species of a European wild deer called the giant deer lived in Ireland about 16,000 years ago. Prehistoric cave paintings in France depict this animal as having a large hump on its back. Fossils of this animal, however, do not show any hump. Nevertheless, there is no reason to conclude that the cave paintings are therefore inaccurate in this regard, since __________.
(A) some prehistoric cave paintings in France also depict other animals as having a hump
(B) fossils of the giant deer are much more common in Ireland than in France
(C) animal humps are composed of fatty tissue, which does not fossilize
(D) the cave paintings of the giant deer were painted well before 16,000 years ago
(E) only one currently existing species of deer has any anatomical feature that even remotely resembles a hump
P:no hump in fossil; hump in pic
C: the pic is correct
OA: C
7/20
化石、遗迹有留存 ≠ 本来就存在
同源题
GWD30-Q38: Theancient Nubians inhabited an area in which typhus occurred, yet surprisinglyfew of their skeletons show the usual evidence of this disease. The skeletons do show deposits oftetracycline, an antibiotic produced by a bacterium common in Nubian soil. This bacterium can flourish on the dried grainused for making two staples of the Nubian diet, beer and bread. Thus, tetracycline in their food probablyexplains the low incidence of typhus among ancient Nubians. P: Nubian skeletons no evidence of typhus(disease) but deposits of tetracycline(antibiotic) C: food ( tetracycline fluorished on dried grain the staple of Nubian) explains the low incidence
gap: deposits of bactria ≠ bacteria in food=》 possibly from other resoures
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argumentrelies? A. The tetracycline deposits did not form after the bodies were buried. B. The diseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians wereexposed would not be affected by tetracycline. C. Typhus is generally fatal. D. Nubian grain became contaminated with tetracycline-producingbacteria prior to being harvested. E. Bread and beer were the only foods eaten by the ancient Nubianswhich could have contained tetracycline. oa: A
GWD18-Q30 The ancient Nubians inhabited anarea in which typhus occurs, yet surprisingly few of their skeletons show theusual evidence of this disease. Theskeletons do show deposits of tetracycline, an antibiotic produced by abacterium common in Nubian soil. Thisbacterium can flourish on the dried grain used for making two staples of theNubian diet, beer and bread. Thus,tetracycline in their food probably explains the low incidence of typhus amongancient Nubians. Which of the following is an assumption on whichthe argument relies? A. Infectiousdiseases other than typhus to which the ancient Nubians were exposed areunaffected by tetracycline. B. Tetracycline is not rendered ineffective as anantibiotic by exposure to the processes involved in making bread and beer. C. Typhuscannot be transmitted by ingesting bread or beer contaminated with theinfectious agents of this disease. D. Breadand beer were the only items in the diet of the ancient Nubians which couldhave contained tetracycline. E. Typhusis generally fatal.
OA: B
P: Nubian skeletons no evidence of typhus(disease) but deposits of tetracycline(antibiotic) C: food ( tetracycline fluorished on dried grain for the staple of Nubian) explains the low incidence
gap: deposits of bactria ≠ bacteria in food=》 possibly from other resoures
有某地的遗迹 不等于 就是某地的人/某地人的产物、
Prep2012-Pack1-CR-044 VCR005074 MediumThe Nile Delta of Egypt was invaded and ruled from 1650 to 1550 B.C. by a peoplecalled the Hyksos.Their origin is uncertain, but archaeologists hypothesize that they were Canaanites. In supportof this hypothesis, the archaeologists point out that excavations of Avaris,the Hyksos capitalin Egypt, have uncovered large numbersof artifacts virtuallyidentical toartifacts producedin Ashkelon, a major city of Canaan atthe time of the Hyksosinvasion.
In order to evaluate the forceof the archaeologists’ evidence,it would be most useful to determinewhich of the following? A. Whether there were some artifactsfound at Avaris thatwere unlike those produced in Ashkelonbut that date to before 1700 B.C. B. Whether the Hyksos ruled any other part of Egypt besidesthe Delta in the period from 1650 to 1550 B.C. C. Whether Avaris was the nearest Hyksoscity in Egypt to Canaan D. Whether Ashkelon after 1550 B.C. continuedto produce artifacts similar to those found at Avaris E. Whether many of the artifactsfound at Avaris that are similarto artifacts producedin Ashkelon date to well before the Hyksos invasion OA: E
GWD 31-10 与上一题同题源The Hyksos invaded the Nile Delta of Egypt and ruled it from 1650 B.C. Their origin is uncertain, but archaeologists hypothesize that they were Canaanites. In support of this hypothesis, the archaeologists point out that excavations of Avans, the Hyksos capital in Egypt, have uncovered large numbers of artifacts virtually Identical to artifacts produced in Ashkelon, and Ashkelon was a major city of Canaan at the time of the Hyksos’ invasion.
In order to evaluate the force of the archaeologists’ evidence, it would useful to determine which of the following?
A: Whether artifacts from Ashkelon were widely traded to non-Canaanite cities?
B: Whether significant numbers of artifacts that do not resemble artifacts produced in Ashkelon have been found at Avans?
C: Whether Avans was the nearest Hyksos city in Egypt to Canaan?
D: Whether Ashkelon after 1550 B.C. continued to produce artifacts similar to those found at Avans?
E: whether any artifacts produced by the Hyksos after 1550 B.C .have been found in Egypt
OA: A
GWD-23-Q32
Excavations of the Roman city of Sepphoris have uncovered numerous detailed mosaics depicting several readily identifiable animal species: a hare, a partridge, and various Mediterranean fish. Oddly, most of the species represented did not live in the Sepphoris region when these mosaics were created. Since identical motifs appear in mosaics found in other Roman cities, however, the mosaics of Sepphoris were very likely created by traveling artisans from some other part of the Roman Empire.
Which of the following is an assumption on which the argument depends?
- A,The Sepphoris mosaics are not composed exclusively of types of stones found naturally in the Sepphoris area.
- B,There is no single region to which all the species depicted in the Sepphoris mosaics are native.
- C,No motifs appear in the Sepphoris mosaics that do not also appear in the mosaics of some other Roman city.
- D,All of the animal figures in the Sepphoris mosaics are readily identifiable as representations of known species.
- E,There was not a common repertory of mosaic designs with which artisans who lived in various parts of the Roman Empirewere familiar.
OA: E
|