逻辑部分总结: TEST18 SECTION 1 24. Somewhere, somehow, what was once a perfectly good rule by which to live was twisted into the false and sinister idea that “Money is the root of all evil.” To the contrary, the proper use of money provides us with the food, clothes, health care, and shelter that we all need to sustain our lives. The author’s argument is logically flawed in that it (A) uses examples that do not refute the generalization that all evil is rooted in money (B) uses inappropriate examples to demonstrate the proper use of money (C) ignores some of the evil things that money can buy (D) fails to acknowledge that food, clothes, health care, and shelter can sometimes lead to evil(A) (E) fails to recognize that money can be used for a lot of other good things besides sustenance 文章类型:不管在哪,不管怎么样,一个曾经被人信奉的好的原则被扭曲成错误的和险恶的观点,那就是金钱是万恶之源。相反,合理的使用金钱能为我们提供食物,依附,健康医疗和住所,这些事我们维持我们生活的必须品。 Flaw:没有反驳金钱是万恶之源的观点,对应选项A Questions 21-22 This country does not need any more restrictions on pollution. In fact, we should abolish those that are currently on the books. In spite of various restrictions, pollution levels have actually increased over the past 40 years. Most importantly, dramatic statistics show that, as pollution levels have increased over this period, the general health of the population has improved rather than deteriorated. 文章类型:结论解释型 本国不需要更多的污染物法规。实际上,我们应该取消教科书上的现行的法规。尽管有各种各样的法规,污染物水平实际上在过去40年里上升了。最重要的是,引人瞩目的统计数据表明,当这段时间污染物水平上升时,本国人口的一般健康已经得到改善而不是恶化。 21. Which one of the following assertions, if true, provides the most effective challenge to the author’s conclusion? (A) The general health of this country’s population has improved over the past 40 years primarily because of new advances in medicine and nutrition, not because of pollution. (B) There are several countries in the world in which there have been no restrictions on pollution over the past 40 years, and pollution levels have actually increased. (C) Similar statistics show that, in several countries, the general health of the population has improved over the past 40 years, while pollution levels have actually decreased. (D) Pollution levels would have increased even more than they have and the general health of the population would not have improved as much as it has without the restrictions that have been on the books.(D) (E) In the period prior to the past 40 years, pollution restrictions were nonexistent in this country and the general health of the population improved at a far slower rate than it did during the past 40 years. 文章所说的两个方面来削弱,1.污染物水平;2.人们的健康水平,所以提供了最大的削弱。另外,以后做题,要看完所有的选项,再来确定答案。减少错误几率。 22. The author concludes that there should be no restrictions on pollution partly because (A) they are no longer needed to improve the general health of the population (B) they reduce the positive effect that pollution has on the general health of the population (C) statistics show that as pollution restrictions have increased so have pollution levels (D) pollution has not yet reached levels that are detrimental to the health of the general population(E) (E) they are ineffective in lowering pollution levels 18. If there is a decrease in the number of homeless families, then either the number of available jobs has increased or else the cost of renting or purchasing housing has decreased. If the cost of renting or purchasing housing has decreased, then the supply of housing must be greater than the demand. 文章类型:前提结论型 如果无家可归的家庭数目减少,哪么要么可获得的工作数目增加,要么租屋或够买房子的成本下降。如果租屋和购买房子的成本下降,哪么房子的供给必须大于需求。 Assume that there is a decrease in the number of homeless families. According to the passage, which one of the following statements CANNOT be true? (A) The number of jobs has been decreasing. (B) The cost of renting or purchasing housing has been decreasing, and housing supply exceeds demand. (C) The number of jobs has been increasing, and the cost of renting or purchasing housing has been stable. (D) The number of jobs has been decreasing, the cost of renting or purchasing housing has been decreasing, and housing demand exceeds supply.(D) (E) The number of jobs has been increasing, the cost of renting or purchasing housing has been increasing, and housing supply exceeds demand. 这道题目选D而不选E的理由在于,D的前半部分不能让结论成立,而E项前半部分可以让结论成立。这道题有点晕,明显DE两项后面部分不可能成立。如果结论成立,题目是要求下面哪个选项不可能是真的。 16. Colleges boast about the great sizes of their libraries. They quote figures in the hundreds of thousands of volumes, but how many books can a student read in four years—a thousand? What good, then, are all the rest? Which one of the following statements most accurately expresses the author’s main point? (A) College librarians do not have anything about which they can boast. (B) No student can read more than a thousand books in four years. (C) It is silly to boast about a library’s size, regardless of whether the library is large or small. (D) Unused books are a waste of taxpayers’ money.(E) (E) College libraries are unnecessarily large. 表达强烈的感情倾向经常是错误的标志,silly。 7. All psychiatrists are doctors. Only psychiatrists were invited to the conference. All who were invited to the conference stayed at the Hefford Hotel. Therefore, only psychiatrists stayed at the Hefford Hotel. Which one of the following statements, if added as a premise to the argument, would make the conclusion valid? (A) Only those who were invited to the conference stayed at the Hefford Hotel. (B) All who were invited to the conference were psychiatrists. (C) All psychiatrists were invited to the conference. (D) No one who was invited to the conference failed to stay at the Hefford Hotel.(A) (E) Only doctors stayed at the Hefford Hotel. 所有的精神病专家都是医生。只有精神病专家被邀请参加该会议。所有被邀请参加改会议的都住在H饭店中。所以只有精神病专家住在H饭店。 错误思路:如果邀请的只有精神病专家的话(这个前提文章已经提到了的),哪么就只有精神并专家住在H饭店。 正确思路:只有那些被邀请参加会议的主在H饭店。 Questions 8-9 A thing is “nauseous” if it makes one sick to the stomach; the unfortunate victim of this malaise is “nauseated.” The common misuse of “nauseous” can be illustrated with the following sentence: “When he sits too long, turns his head too abruptly, or walks any distance, he gets dizzy, loses balance, and becomes nauseous.” He doesn’t become nauseous unless he turns other people’s stomachs; he becomes nauseated. A person who is nauseated is no more nauseous than a person who has been poisoned is poisonous. 8. Based on the passage above, which phrase does NOT provide a logical completion to the following sentence? A person who is nauseated is no more nauseous than a person who has been______ (A) murdered is murderous (B) corrupted is corruptible (C) awed is awesome (D) irritated is irritating(B) (E) scared is scary 题干没看懂不知道是什么意思。 5. All 250 of the city’s Democratic ward leaders were polled about the number of registered Republicans who became registered Democrats during the year. From the reports of the 20 leaders who replied to the questionnaire, we know that altogether they received a total of 500 former Republicans into the Democratic party within the year. Projecting from this sample, we conclude that at least 6,000 Republicans became Democrats during the year. Which one of the following statements, if true, most clearly undermines the conclusion? (A) Several years ago, 5,000 members of the Republican party registered as Democrats. (B) The more than 90 percent of ward leaders not replying had no former Republicans registering as Democrats. (C) Because they were too busy, more than 90 percent of the ward leaders did not reply. (D) A number of the newly registered Democrats returned to the Republican party at a later date.(B) (E) Similar figures can be produced from past years for registration changes from the Democratic party to the Republican party. 原文涉及到数字,那么可能跟数学有关,且看那一年共有6000共和党的人转向民主党是如何得出来的。250/20*500=6250 |