ChaseDream
搜索
1234下一页
返回列表 发新帖
查看: 11787|回复: 34
打印 上一主题 下一主题

求问og-72好心的看过来谢谢

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2005-3-6 17:01:00 | 只看该作者

求问og-72好心的看过来谢谢

og--72 提问

72. Large national budget deficits do not cause large trade deficits. If they did, countries with the largest budget deficits would also have the largest trade deficits. In fact, when deficit figures are adjusted so that different countries are reliably comparable to each other, there is no such correlation.


If the statements above are all true, which of the following can properly be inferred on the


basis of them?


(A) Countries with large national budget deficits tend to restrict foreign trade.


(B) Reliable comparisons of the deficit figures of one country with those of another are


impossible.



(C) Reducing a country’s national budget deficit will not necessarily result in a lowering of


any trade deficit that country may have.


(D) When countries are ordered from largest to smallest in terms of population, the smallest


countries generally have the smallest budget and trade deficits.


(E) Countries with the largest trade deficits never have similarly large national budget


deficits.


哪未能帮忙翻译一下题干阿 ?谢谢

沙发
发表于 2005-3-6 17:07:00 | 只看该作者

巨大的国家预算赤字不一定导致巨大的贸易赤字。如果是的话,那么,预算赤字巨大的国家其贸易赤字也巨大。事实上,如果把每个国家的赤字调整到互相具有可比性,那么国家预算赤字与贸易赤字就不存在这样的关系了。

板凳
发表于 2005-4-1 16:29:00 | 只看该作者

用排除法就可以做出来的。A和D无关,C和D太绝对,

C的意思就是说既然不存在这样的correlation,那么 reduction in national budget deficit 也就不一定会 lead to the reduction in trade deficit. 好象就是把no correlation变了个法说了一下。

地板
发表于 2005-6-10 23:57:00 | 只看该作者

我看不懂OG上对E的解释?Finally, it is consistent with the passage that countries with the largest trade deficits sometimes have similarly large budget deficits (choice E).

5#
发表于 2005-6-11 02:56:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用徵徵在2005-4-1 16:29:00的发言:

用排除法就可以做出来的。A和D无关,C和D太绝对,



should be D & E ba? C is correct.
6#
发表于 2005-6-17 14:37:00 | 只看该作者

A 无关,无tend to restrict foreign trade


B impossible绝对化语言,且题中给出了adjust的一种方式


C Large national budget deficits do not cause large trade deficits. 换了种说法


D 与population无关


E never绝对化语言,题中无此暗示。

7#
发表于 2005-6-17 15:22:00 | 只看该作者

infer题就是找范围更小的,或者干脆就是同义句的,千万别加自己的联想,

8#
发表于 2005-6-19 18:52:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用anni515在2005-6-10 23:57:00的发言:

我看不懂OG上对E的解释?Finally, it is consistent with the passage that countries with the largest trade deficits sometimes have similarly large budget deficits (choice E).


In fact, when deficit figures are adjusted…似乎暗示deficits figures-national budget deficits和trade deficits 是有可能同时发生,只是经过调整后,两者是没有因果关系,没有因果关系,不代表不会同时发生
不晓得其它网友还有没有不同的意见可以分享?


[此贴子已经被作者于2005-6-20 8:28:56编辑过]
9#
发表于 2005-7-3 21:05:00 | 只看该作者

还是没明白对E选项的解释。E选项是绝对化的说“有largest trade deficits的国家从不会有类似的large  national budget deficits. ”而ets的解释是e选项和文中一致“有largest trade deficits的国家有时候会有类似的large  national budget deficits.


我是那里没有弄明白?

10#
发表于 2005-7-22 17:17:00 | 只看该作者

有同样的困惑,顶!

您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-9-20 02:50
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部