(E)ETS的explaination is just trying to say "The largest trade deficits have similarly budeget defits " 這件事consistent with passage(與題意相容不互斥,budeget deficits跟trade deficit非因果,但也並非互斥事件,有可能同時存在), 也就是(e)选因此推論不对了,有錯請指正喔
I don't get E)'s OG explanation as well. I think it should be "inconsistent"...however, I do think what OG is trying to say is the same as what wenlovying above explains.
my opinion--don't waste time on this. And thanks so much for bringing up this confusion!!
Finally, it is consistent with the passage that countries with the largest trade deficits sometimes have similarly large budget deficits 意思就是有可能国家存在大的财政赤字的时候正好也存在大的贸易赤字,这种说法原文没有矛盾,是一致的。(但这贸易赤字不是财政赤字所导致的),所以那个never是错的,E就是错的。OG对于E的解释就是这个意思啊,明白了吗?
I don't get E)'s OG explanation as well. I think it should be "inconsistent"...however, I do think what OG is trying to say is the same as what wenlovying above explains.
my opinion--don't waste time on this. And thanks so much for bringing up this confusion!!
(E) Countries with the largest trade deficits never have similarly large national budget deficits.
OG解释: Finally, it is consistent with the passage that countries with the largest trade deficits sometimes have similarly large budget deficits (choice E).
E是说贸易赤字最大的国家从来不会有类似大的预算赤字。这个肯定是不对的,有可能会使这种情况。但不理解的是og 的解释。按照og的解释好像E选项说的是countries with the largest trade deficits sometimes have similarly large budget deficits (贸易赤字最大的国家有时会有类似大的预算赤字)。可实际E选项说的不是这个意思呀