|
28-7: In 1960’s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which Rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, although there was an increase in instances of “coping” behavior – such as submissive gestures and avoidance of dominant individuals – attacks did not become any more frequent. Therefore it is not likely that, for any species of monkey, crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen in rats.
Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?
A: All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions.
B: In the studies of rats, nondominant individuals were found to increasingly avoid dominant individuals when the animals were in crowded conditions.
C: Rhesus monkeys respond with aggression to a wider range of stimuli than any other monkeys do.
D: Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in significantly more attacks than the other monkeys were.
E: Some of the coping behavior displayed by rhesus monkeys is similar to behavior rhesus monkeys use to bring to an end an attack that has begun.
题干的意思是说，所有种类的猴子，不会像老鼠一样，挤在一起就打，并不太可能。
C的意思：Rhesus比起任何其他的猴子，因为更多的因素，而导致打斗行为。
E的意思：在实验中Rhesus表现出一种使打斗结束的行为。
那么，明显E要比C make sense。C其实比较的猴子之间，而与crowding这个前提无关。
我觉得E更好！
请大家给点意见
[此贴子已经被作者于2005-11-6 19:23:08编辑过] | 
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号
发表于 2005-11-6 19:17:00
楼主
