[求助]GWD28-7 大家帮忙看看！

shashaxz

28-7: In 1960’s studies of rats, scientists found that crowding increases the number of attacks among the animals significantly. But in recent experiments in which Rhesus monkeys were placed in crowded conditions, although there was an increase in instances of “coping” behavior – such as submissive gestures and avoidance of dominant individuals – attacks did not become any more frequent. Therefore it is not likely that, for any species of monkey, crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen in rats.

Which of the following, if true, most strengthens the argument?

A: All the observed forms of coping behavior can be found among rhesus monkeys living in uncrowded conditions.

B: In the studies of rats, nondominant individuals were found to increasingly avoid dominant individuals when the animals were in crowded conditions.

C: Rhesus monkeys respond with aggression to a wider range of stimuli than any other monkeys do.

D: Some individual monkeys in the experiment were involved in significantly more attacks than the other monkeys were.

E: Some of the coping behavior displayed by rhesus monkeys is similar to behavior rhesus monkeys use to bring to an end an attack that has begun.

题干的意思是说，所有种类的猴子，不会像老鼠一样，挤在一起就打，并不太可能。

C的意思：Rhesus比起任何其他的猴子，因为更多的因素，而导致打斗行为。

E的意思：在实验中Rhesus表现出一种使打斗结束的行为。

那么，明显E要比C make sense。C其实比较的猴子之间，而与crowding这个前提无关。

我觉得E更好！

请大家给点意见

[此贴子已经被作者于2005-11-6 19:23:08编辑过]

shashaxz

help pls!

shashaxz

自己再顶！哭求回复！

kattie

我也觉得是选e,c看上去像无关

wxl_car

But in recent experiments in which Rhesus monkeys,,,Therefore it is not likely that, for any species of monkey, crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen in rats.看完这个结论，我第一感觉是样本能否推总体,实验结果只是对某一种猴子做的，凭什么就说所有的种类都这样呢。所以加强就应该说明这个样本是能够代表总体的，和总体无差异，要么原本就是总体。削弱就该说这个样本有某某特殊性，而总体是不具备的，所以不能代表总体。我这题是选C的，说明这种猴子相比其他猴子更容易受刺激会攻击，这就说明它已经代表了总体中最麻烦的一种，它都没问题了，any species 也就没问题了。不知对不对：）罗嗦了。

yangxiaogang

已经确认，是E

GMATMAKER

以下是引用yangxiaogang在2005-11-24 9:28:00的发言：

已经确认，是E

麻烦讲下为什么选E?实在不懂,这是个 个体推一般啊.

shashaxz

楼上在偷换概念。

不是说attack增加，而是使attack减少的动作增加。

consider this scenario, 我和一堆人挤在一起，我们不但没有打架，还老是互相说，不要打了，不要打了。

那么对于我们这组人来说，挤在一起，不见得一定要扁成一团。

steveyangxt

以下是引用wxl_car在2005-11-19 18:46:00的发言：
But in recent experiments in which Rhesus monkeys,,,Therefore it is not likely that, for any species of monkey, crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen in rats.看完这个结论，我第一感觉是样本能否推总体,实验结果只是对某一种猴子做的，凭什么就说所有的种类都这样呢。所以加强就应该说明这个样本是能够代表总体的，和总体无差异，要么原本就是总体。削弱就该说这个样本有某某特殊性，而总体是不具备的，所以不能代表总体。我这题是选C的，说明这种猴子相比其他猴子更容易受刺激会攻击，这就说明它已经代表了总体中最麻烦的一种，它都没问题了，any species 也就没问题了。不知对不对：）罗嗦了。

对的 是这么回事。

kevinZhang

以下是引用wxl_car在2005-11-19 18:46:00的发言：
But in recent experiments in which Rhesus monkeys,,,Therefore it is not likely that, for any species of monkey, crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen in rats.看完这个结论，我第一感觉是样本能否推总体,实验结果只是对某一种猴子做的，凭什么就说所有的种类都这样呢。所以加强就应该说明这个样本是能够代表总体的，和总体无差异，要么原本就是总体。削弱就该说这个样本有某某特殊性，而总体是不具备的，所以不能代表总体。我这题是选C的，说明这种猴子相比其他猴子更容易受刺激会攻击，这就说明它已经代表了总体中最麻烦的一种，它都没问题了，any species 也就没问题了。不知对不对：）罗嗦了。

支持C. ANY太唐突了, 作为结论中的新概念, 应该要有说明或者与前文有逻辑联系. C很好的填补了这个GAP.

E应该是无关项.