ChaseDream
搜索
返回列表 发新帖
楼主: shashaxz
打印 上一主题 下一主题

[求助]GWD28-7 大家帮忙看看!

[复制链接]
21#
发表于 2007-7-29 09:34:00 | 只看该作者
?
22#
发表于 2007-7-29 10:07:00 | 只看该作者
个人觉得5楼jj的process of reasoning is so perfect:)
23#
发表于 2007-7-30 23:39:00 | 只看该作者

ding

24#
发表于 2007-8-31 20:35:00 | 只看该作者
up
25#
发表于 2007-8-31 20:39:00 | 只看该作者
答案是A
26#
发表于 2007-9-2 07:10:00 | 只看该作者
(C)
Conclusion of argument is
"Therefore it is not likely that, for any species of monkey, crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen in rats."
Based on the observation of
Rhesus, the author argues that ALL monkey behaves differently than rats.
So the assumption is
Rhesus can represent other monkeys.
    



27#
发表于 2007-10-14 20:26:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用wxl_car在2005-11-19 18:46:00的发言:
But in recent experiments in which Rhesus monkeys,,,Therefore it is not likely that, for any species of monkey, crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen in rats.看完这个结论,我第一感觉是样本能否推总体,实验结果只是对某一种猴子做的,凭什么就说所有的种类都这样呢。所以加强就应该说明这个样本是能够代表总体的,和总体无差异,要么原本就是总体。削弱就该说这个样本有某某特殊性,而总体是不具备的,所以不能代表总体。我这题是选C的,说明这种猴子相比其他猴子更容易受刺激会攻击,这就说明它已经代表了总体中最麻烦的一种,它都没问题了,any species 也就没问题了。不知对不对:)罗嗦了。

但是it is not likely再加个any的意思是说只要有一种猴子满足“拥挤条件下不象老鼠一样激进”就行了啊,并不需要所有猴子都不激进啊

我觉得选A是对的:

文中只说有cope行为上升,所以只要否认这种行为是激进行为就行了,只要这个行为在不拥挤的情况下也发生,就说明它不是激进行为

28#
发表于 2007-11-14 03:53:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用llxx1985cn在2007-6-11 22:44:00的发言:
Why not A?

orignally i choose A also. because i thought the coping behavior is mentioned in the passage, therefore, the answer must be related to it. however, after readingthe explaination of C, i realized that choice A is just one to make us confused.

because, A cannot prove that Rhesus monkeys r not like rats, although it SEEMS like, and SEEMS related to the questions.

Even all the moneys have coping behaviors, so ? its not related to crowded environment or aggression.

personal opinion. welcome ur correction.

29#
发表于 2008-4-11 14:45:00 | 只看该作者

就是C,E是削弱

c: 能使Rm打架的因素比其他猴子多,说明Rm比其他猴子更容易打架,连Rm都表现出不怎么打架,其他猴子就更不会了。

E:就是由于在实验中所看到的行为是打架结束的象征,所以说明在看到实验结果前猴子就已经打过架了。当然削弱了

30#
发表于 2008-7-24 18:17:00 | 只看该作者
But in recent experiments in which Rhesus monkeys,,,Therefore it is not likely that, for any species
of monkey, crowding increases aggression as significantly as was seen
in
rats.看完这个结论,我第一感觉是样本能否推总体,实验结果只是对某一种猴子做的,凭什么就说所有的种类都这样呢。所以加强就应该说明这个样本是能够
代表总体的,和总体无差异,要么原本就是总体。削弱就该说这个样本有某某特殊性,而总体是不具备的,所以不能代表总体。我这题是选C的,说明这种猴子相比
其他猴子更容易受刺激会攻击,这就说明它已经代表了总体中最麻烦的一种,它都没问题了,any species 也就没问题了。不知对不对:)罗嗦了。


完全明白,多谢
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-11-29 19:02
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部