ChaseDream
搜索
123下一页
返回列表 发新帖
00:00:00

A proposed change to federal income tax laws would eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations ataxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions. If this change were adopted, wealthy individualswould no longer be permitted such deductions. Therefore, many charitable and educational institutions wouldhave to reduce services, and some would have to close their doors.

The argument above assumes which of the following?

正确答案: A

更多相关帖子

524

帖子

15

好友

4712

积分

ChaseDream

注册时间
2003-03-17
精华
8
解析
查看: 7254|回复: 22
打印 上一主题 下一主题

分享体会:OG-195

[复制链接]
楼主
发表于 2004-9-26 13:07:00 | 只看该作者

分享体会:OG-195

花了半个小时,终于明白了一点:不能太绝对!


195. A proposed change to federal income tax laws would eliminate deductions from taxable income for donations a taxpayer has made to charitable and educational institutions. If this change were adopted, wealthy individuals would no longer be permitted such deductions. Therefore, many charitable and educational institutions would have to reduce services, and some would have to close their doors.

The argument above assumes which of the following?

(A) Without the incentives offered by federal income tax laws, at least some wealthy individuals would not donate as much money to charitable and educational institutions as they otherwise would have.
(B) Money contributed by individuals who make their donations because of provisions in the federal tax laws provides the only source of funding for many charitable and educational institutions.
(C) The primary reason for not adopting the proposed change in the federal income tax laws cited above is to protect wealthy individuals from having to pay higher taxes.
(D) Wealthy individuals who donate money to charitable and educational institutions are the only individuals who donate money to such institutions.
(E) Income tax laws should be changed to make donations to charitable and educational institutions the only permissible deductions from taxable income.


我总认为A,B,D都可以算是ASSUMPTION,都合理.想了半天,发现提干中"many charitable and educational institutions would have to reduce services, and some would have to close their doors"和A中:"...least some wealthy individuals would not donate ..."是相一致的.


而B中:"...provides the only source of ..."和D中:"...are the only individuals who are the only individuals who ..."说法太绝对了,不和题目中的说法一致.


所以,明白了ETS出题还是有一定讲究的:不能太绝对!



沙发
发表于 2004-9-26 13:12:00 | 只看该作者
yes, abosolutely right.
板凳
发表于 2004-9-26 13:30:00 | 只看该作者
hehe, ''abosolutely'' is acceptable here.
地板
发表于 2004-9-26 22:59:00 | 只看该作者
顶一下。今天狒狒也讲了,答案不能太绝对。不过我怎么找不到他说的那道题了阿
5#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-9-27 12:01:00 | 只看该作者

他说的是哪道题呀?---偶没上过XDF的说

6#
发表于 2004-9-27 12:21:00 | 只看该作者

they otherwise would have.

短语怎么解释啊,当时就这句没搞清而选了b

7#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-9-27 16:01:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用活在当下在2004-9-27 12:21:00的发言:

they otherwise would have.


短语怎么解释啊,当时就这句没搞清而选了b


我认为是:否则他们就会(donate much money to charitable and educational institutions)---被省略掉了.

8#
发表于 2004-9-28 08:46:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用cherylcui_mba在2004-9-27 16:01:00的发言:


我认为是:否则他们就会(donate much money to charitable and educational institutions)---被省略掉了.



如果有否定含义的,什么双重否定阿之类的看不懂,就先把否定意思取掉读一下,再取非意思就清晰了。这个是狒狒说的,我觉得很有用
9#
发表于 2004-9-28 08:48:00 | 只看该作者
以下是引用cherylcui_mba在2004-9-27 12:01:00的发言:

他说的是哪道题呀?---偶没上过XDF的说



不好意思,我忘记是那道题了。已经发信去问同上课的同学拉,找到了就发上来
10#
 楼主| 发表于 2004-9-28 15:28:00 | 只看该作者
谢谢,SKIDALS的解说
您需要登录后才可以回帖 登录 | 立即注册

Mark一下! 看一下! 顶楼主! 感谢分享! 快速回复:

手机版|ChaseDream|GMT+8, 2024-10-5 17:25
京公网安备11010202008513号 京ICP证101109号 京ICP备12012021号

ChaseDream 论坛

© 2003-2023 ChaseDream.com. All Rights Reserved.

返回顶部